Literature DB >> 24694148

Computerized segmentation of pulmonary nodules depicted in CT examinations using freehand sketches.

Yongqian Qiang1, Qiuping Wang1, Guiping Xu1, Hongxia Ma1, Lei Deng1, Lei Zhang1, Jiantao Pu2, Youmin Guo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To aid a consistent segmentation of pulmonary nodules, the authors describe a novel computerized scheme that utilizes a freehand sketching technique and an improved break-and-repair strategy.
METHODS: This developed scheme consists of two primary parts. The first part is freehand sketch analysis, where the freehand sketching not only serves a natural way of specifying the location of a nodule, but also provides a mechanism for inferring adaptive information (e.g., the mass center, the density, and the size) in regard to the nodule. The second part is an improved break-and-repair strategy. The improvement avoids the time-consuming ray-triangle intersections using spherical bins and replaces the original global implicit surface reconstruction with a local implicit surface fitting and blending scheme. The performance of this scheme, including accuracy and consistence, was assessed using 50 CT examinations in the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC). For each of these examinations, a single nodule was selected under the aid of a publically available tool to assure these nodules were diverse in size, location, and density. Two radiologists were asked to use the developed tool to segment these nodules twice at different times (at least three months apart). A Hausdorff distance based method was used to assess the discrepancies (agreements) between the computerized results and the results by the four radiologists in the LIDC as well as the inter- and intrareader agreements in freehand sketching.
RESULTS: The maximum and mean discrepancies in boundary outlines between the computerized scheme and the radiologists were 2.73 ± 1.32 mm and 1.01 ± 0.47 mm, respectively. When the nodules were classified (binned) into different size ranges, the maximum errors ranged from 1.91 to 4.13 mm; but smaller nodules had larger percentage discrepancies in term of size. Under the aid of the developed scheme, the inter- and intrareader variability in averaged maximum discrepancy across all types of pulmonary nodules were consistently smaller than 0.15 ± 0.07 mm. The computational cost in time of segmenting a pulmonary nodule ranged from 0.4 to 2.3 s with an average of 1.1 s for a typical desktop computer.
CONCLUSIONS: The experiments showed that this scheme could achieve a reasonable performance in nodule segmentation and demonstrated the merits of incorporating freehand sketching into pulmonary nodule segmentation.
© 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24694148      PMCID: PMC3971825          DOI: 10.1118/1.4869265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  36 in total

1.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation.

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; A P Reeves; W J Kostis; B Zhao; C I Henschke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT--phantom study.

Authors:  Jane P Ko; Henry Rusinek; Erika L Jacobs; James S Babb; Margrit Betke; Georgeann McGuinness; David P Naidich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Computerized comprehensive data analysis of lung imaging database consortium (LIDC).

Authors:  Jun Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Joseph K Leader
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Shape "break-and-repair" strategy and its application to automated medical image segmentation.

Authors:  Jiantao Pu; David S Paik; Xin Meng; Justus E Roos; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.579

5.  Evaluation of lung MDCT nodule annotation across radiologists and methods.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Geoffrey McLennan; Denise R Aberle; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber Macmahon; Brian F Mullan; David F Yankelevitz; Edwin J R van Beek; Samuel G Armato; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Anthony P Reeves; David Gur; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Peyton H Bland; Gary Laderach; Richie Pais; David Qing; Chris Piker; Junfeng Guo; Adam Starkey; Daniel Max; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  3-D segmentation algorithm of small lung nodules in spiral CT images.

Authors:  S Diciotti; G Picozzi; M Falchini; M Mascalchi; N Villari; G Valli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2008-01

7.  Automatic segmentation of pulmonary blood vessels and nodules based on local intensity structure analysis and surface propagation in 3D chest CT images.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Takayuki Kitasaka; Hirotoshi Honma; Hirotsugu Takabatake; Masaki Mori; Hiroshi Natori; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Lung cancers diagnosed at annual CT screening: volume doubling times.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Rowena Yip; Anthony P Reeves; Ali Farooqi; Dongming Xu; James P Smith; Daniel M Libby; Mark W Pasmantier; Olli S Miettinen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Proposed Technique for Accurate Detection/Segmentation of Lung Nodules using Spline Wavelet Techniques.

Authors:  T K Senthil Kumar; E N Ganesh
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2013-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Anatomy packing with hierarchical segments: an algorithm for segmentation of pulmonary nodules in CT images.

Authors:  Chi-Hsuan Tsou; Kuo-Lung Lor; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chung-Ming Chen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.