Literature DB >> 21994223

An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment.

Qian Cong1, Lisa N Kinch, Jimin Pei, Shuoyong Shi, Vyacheslav N Grishin, Wenlin Li, Nick V Grishin.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Manual inspection has been applied to and is well accepted for assessing critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP) free modeling (FM) category predictions over the years. Such manual assessment requires expertise and significant time investment, yet has the problems of being subjective and unable to differentiate models of similar quality. It is beneficial to incorporate the ideas behind manual inspection to an automatic score system, which could provide objective and reproducible assessment of structure models.
RESULTS: Inspired by our experience in CASP9 FM category assessment, we developed an automatic superimposition independent method named Quality Control Score (QCS) for structure prediction assessment. QCS captures both global and local structural features, with emphasis on global topology. We applied this method to all FM targets from CASP9, and overall the results showed the best agreement with Manual Inspection Scores among automatic prediction assessment methods previously applied in CASPs, such as Global Distance Test Total Score (GDT_TS) and Contact Score (CS). As one of the important components to guide our assessment of CASP9 FM category predictions, this method correlates well with other scoring methods and yet is able to reveal good-quality models that are missed by GDT_TS. AVAILABILITY: The script for QCS calculation is available at http://prodata.swmed.edu/QCS/. CONTACT: grishin@chop.swmed.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21994223      PMCID: PMC3232368          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  19 in total

1.  A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment.

Authors:  A Zemla; C Venclovas; K Fidelis; B Rost
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-02-01

2.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; James O Wrabl; S Sri Krishna; Indraneel Majumdar; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Yuan Qi; Jimin Pei; Hua Cheng; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

4.  Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Alexander Stark; Caroline Hadley; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

5.  Evaluation of domain prediction in CASP6.

Authors:  Chin-Hsien Tai; Woei-Jyh Lee; James J Vincent; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

6.  Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets.

Authors:  Ralf Jauch; Hock Chuan Yeo; Prasanna R Kolatkar; Neil D Clarke
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

7.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction - Round VIII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Burkhard Rost; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

8.  A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods.

Authors:  J Moult; J T Pedersen; R Judson; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11

9.  Analysis of CASP8 targets, predictions and assessment methods.

Authors:  Shuoyong Shi; Jimin Pei; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Lisa N Kinch; Indraneel Majumdar; Jing Tong; Hua Cheng; Bong-Hyun Kim; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-15

3.  Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Protein structure model refinement in CASP12 using short and long molecular dynamics simulations in implicit solvent.

Authors:  Genki Terashi; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-09-01

5.  Assessment of CASP10 contact-assisted predictions.

Authors:  Todd J Taylor; Hongjun Bai; Chin-Hsien Tai; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

6.  Assessment of template-free modeling in CASP10 and ROLL.

Authors:  Chin-Hsien Tai; Hongjun Bai; Todd J Taylor; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-17

7.  Protein structure prediction using residue- and fragment-environment potentials in CASP11.

Authors:  Hyungrae Kim; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-22

8.  Cryo-electron microscopy targets in CASP13: Overview and evaluation of results.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Sony Malhotra; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Tristan Cragnolini; Agnel-Praveen Joseph; Wah Chiu; Maya Topf
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-23

9.  Assessment of the model refinement category in CASP12.

Authors:  Ladislav Hovan; Vladimiras Oleinikovas; Havva Yalinca; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Giorgio Saladino; Francesco Luigi Gervasio
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-29

10.  Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; Wenlin Li; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.