Literature DB >> 17894330

Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets.

Ralf Jauch1, Hock Chuan Yeo, Prasanna R Kolatkar, Neil D Clarke.   

Abstract

In CASP7, protein structure prediction targets that lacked substantial similarity to a protein in the PDB at the time of assessment were considered to be free modeling targets (FM). We assessed predictions for 14 FM targets as well as four other targets that were deemed to be on the borderline between FM targets and template based modeling targets (TBM/FM). GDT_TS was used as one measure of model quality. Model quality was also assessed by visual inspection. Visual inspection was performed by three independent assessors who were blinded to GDT_TS scores and other quantitative measures of model quality. The best models by visual inspection tended to rank among the top few percent by GDT_TS, but were typically not the highest scoring models. Thus, visual inspection remains an essential component of assessment for FM targets. Overall, group TS020 (Baker) performed best, but success on individual targets was widely distributed among many groups. Among these other groups, TS024 and TS025 (Zhang and Zhang server) performed notably well without exceptionally large computing resources. This should be considered encouraging for future CASPs. There was a sense of progress in template FM relative to CASP6, but we were unable to demonstrate this progress objectively. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17894330     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  47 in total

1.  Structure prediction and binding sites analysis of curcin protein of Jatropha curcas using computational approaches.

Authors:  Mugdha Srivastava; Shishir K Gupta; P C Abhilash; Nandita Singh
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment.

Authors:  Qian Cong; Lisa N Kinch; Jimin Pei; Shuoyong Shi; Vyacheslav N Grishin; Wenlin Li; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?

Authors:  Jinrui Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Physical-chemical determinants of coil conformations in globular proteins.

Authors:  Lauren L Perskie; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Automated protein structure modeling in CASP9 by I-TASSER pipeline combined with QUARK-based ab initio folding and FG-MD-based structure refinement.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Jian Zhang; Ambrish Roy; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-23

6.  A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  A comparative study of the reported performance of ab initio protein structure prediction algorithms.

Authors:  Glennie Helles
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A new prediction strategy for long local protein structures using an original description.

Authors:  Aurélie Bornot; Catherine Etchebest; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-08-15

9.  A free-energy approach for all-atom protein simulation.

Authors:  Abhinav Verma; Wolfgang Wenzel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Dmytro Guzenko; Aleix Lafita; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Jose M Duarte
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.