Literature DB >> 12381844

MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Angel R Ortiz1, Charlie E M Strauss, Osvaldo Olmea.   

Abstract

Advances in structural genomics and protein structure prediction require the design of automatic, fast, objective, and well benchmarked methods capable of comparing and assessing the similarity of low-resolution three-dimensional structures, via experimental or theoretical approaches. Here, a new method for sequence-independent structural alignment is presented that allows comparison of an experimental protein structure with an arbitrary low-resolution protein tertiary model. The heuristic algorithm is given and then used to show that it can describe random structural alignments of proteins with different folds with good accuracy by an extreme value distribution. From this observation, a structural similarity score between two proteins or two different conformations of the same protein is derived from the likelihood of obtaining a given structural alignment by chance. The performance of the derived score is then compared with well established, consensus manual-based scores and data sets. We found that the new approach correlates better than other tools with the gold standard provided by a human evaluator. Timings indicate that the algorithm is fast enough for routine use with large databases of protein models. Overall, our results indicate that the new program (MAMMOTH) will be a good tool for protein structure comparisons in structural genomics applications. MAMMOTH is available from our web site at http://physbio.mssm.edu/~ortizg/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381844      PMCID: PMC2373724          DOI: 10.1110/ps.0215902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  66 in total

1.  Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction.

Authors:  C A Orengo; J E Bray; T Hubbard; L LoConte; I Sillitoe
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  Ab initio folding of proteins using restraints derived from evolutionary information.

Authors:  A R Ortiz; A Kolinski; P Rotkiewicz; B Ilkowski; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

3.  Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA.

Authors:  K T Simons; R Bonneau; I Ruczinski; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

4.  Structure classification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets.

Authors:  A G Murzin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

5.  Automated multiple structure alignment and detection of a common substructural motif.

Authors:  N Leibowitz; Z Y Fligelman; R Nussinov; H J Wolfson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-05-15

6.  Structural genomics takes off.

Authors:  J Thornton
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  A new algorithm for the alignment of multiple protein structures using Monte Carlo optimization.

Authors:  C Guda; E D Scheeff; P E Bourne; I N Shindyalov
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2001

8.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  MUSTA--a general, efficient, automated method for multiple structure alignment and detection of common motifs: application to proteins.

Authors:  N Leibowitz; R Nussinov; H J Wolfson
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 10.  Nuclear magnetic resonance in the era of structural genomics.

Authors:  J H Prestegard; H Valafar; J Glushka; F Tian
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  183 in total

Review 1.  Structural genomics: computational methods for structure analysis.

Authors:  Sharon Goldsmith-Fischman; Barry Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server.

Authors:  David E Kim; Dylan Chivian; David Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles.

Authors:  Marc A Marti-Renom; M S Madhusudhan; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies.

Authors:  Alejandra Leo-Macias; Pedro Lopez-Romero; Dmitry Lupyan; Daniel Zerbino; Angel R Ortiz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment.

Authors:  Qian Cong; Lisa N Kinch; Jimin Pei; Shuoyong Shi; Vyacheslav N Grishin; Wenlin Li; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  A comparison of genotype-phenotype maps for RNA and proteins.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?

Authors:  Jinrui Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Characterizing the regularity of tetrahedral packing motifs in protein tertiary structure.

Authors:  Ryan Day; Kristin P Lennox; David B Dahl; Marina Vannucci; Jerry W Tsai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  R3D Align: global pairwise alignment of RNA 3D structures using local superpositions.

Authors:  Ryan R Rahrig; Neocles B Leontis; Craig L Zirbel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Elicitation of structure-specific antibodies by epitope scaffolds.

Authors:  Gilad Ofek; F Javier Guenaga; William R Schief; Jeff Skinner; David Baker; Richard Wyatt; Peter D Kwong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.