Literature DB >> 21984354

Pain relief and functional improvement remain 20 years after knee arthroplasty.

John B Meding1, Lindsey K Meding, Merrill A Ritter, E Michael Keating.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TKA provides demonstrable pain relief and improved health-related quality of life. Yet, a decline in physical function may occur over the long term despite the absence of implant-related problems. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does pain relief diminish over 20 years after TKA? (2) Does function decline over 20 years in terms of Knee Society function, knee, and walking scores? And (3) what is the patient-reported activity level at most recent followup? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 1471 patients with 1757 primary cruciate-retaining TKAs implanted between 1975 and 1989 and identified 128 living patients (8.7%) with 171 TKAs. Ninety-three patients were women. We determined Knee Society scores prospectively and UCLA scores retrospectively. Minimum followup was 20 years (average, 21.1 years; range, 20-27 years). Average age at last followup was 82.3 years (range, 45-103 years). Of the 128 patients, 66 (73 TKAs) died after 20-year followup.
RESULTS: Pain scores did not diminish over time (average, 49; range, 20-50). Average knee score was 78 (range, 39-97). Function, stair, and walking scores diminished over time. Average function score was 70 (range, 5-100), primarily due to an average stair score of 35 (range, 0-50); average walking score was 37 (range, 10-50). All but two patients (two TKAs) could negotiate stairs; 95 patients (124 TKAs) could walk at least five blocks; three patients (three TKAs) were housebound. Of the 62 patients still living (98 TKAs), the average UCLA activity score was 8.3 (range, 5-10).
CONCLUSIONS: Although aging may cause a gradual decline in physical activity, an improved functional capacity and activity level continue 20 years or more after TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21984354      PMCID: PMC3237980          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2123-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Outcome in patients lost to follow-up.

Authors:  Atul B Joshi; Gurdev S Gill; Patricia L Smith
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study.

Authors:  J A Rodriguez; H Bhende; C S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup.

Authors:  V Pavone; F Boettner; S Fickert; T P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Long-term results of Kinematic Condylar knee replacement. An analysis of 404 knees.

Authors:  G S Gill; A B Joshi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Olivier Ethgen; Olivier Bruyère; Florent Richy; Charles Dardennes; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Knee scores change with length of follow-up after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James Benjamin; Randy Johnson; Steve Porter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; B J Thomas; R Jinnah; W Kim; T Grogan; C Yale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores.

Authors:  M A Ritter; A E Thong; K E Davis; M E Berend; J B Meding; P M Faris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04
View more
  24 in total

1.  Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the US.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Relationship Between Knee Pain and Patient Preferences for Joint Replacement: Health Care Access Matters.

Authors:  Ernest R Vina; Di Ran; Erin L Ashbeck; Manjinder Kaur; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Fifteen-year survival of the Cedior™ total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Edouard Fadlallah; Guillaume Villatte; Aurélien Mulliez; Stéphane Descamps; Stéphane Boisgard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-06

4.  CORR Insights®: How do knee implants perform past the second decade? Nineteen- to 25-year followup of the Press-fit Condylar design TKA.

Authors:  Ville Remes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Physical activity after total knee arthroplasty: A critical review.

Authors:  Roger J Paxton; Edward L Melanson; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18

6.  Relationship of the posterior femoral axis of the "kinematically aligned" total knee arthroplasty to the posterior condylar, transepicondylar, and anteroposterior femoral axes.

Authors:  Andrew Park; Stephen T Duncan; Ryan M Nunley; James A Keeney; Robert L Barrack; Denis Nam
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  New total knee arthroplasty designs: do young patients notice?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Denis Nam; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Douglas A Dennis; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis improve survival? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Devyani Misra; Na Lu; David Felson; Hyon K Choi; John Seeger; Thomas Einhorn; Tuhina Neogi; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Monti Khatod; Eric Yue; Tadashi Funahashi; Thomas Barber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Do patients return to work after total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Ryan M Nunley; Keith R Berend; Erin L Ruh; John C Clohisy; William G Hamilton; Craig J Della Valle; Javad Parvizi; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.