| Literature DB >> 12629603 |
Atul B Joshi, Gurdev S Gill, Patricia L Smith.
Abstract
Long-term outcome studies are valuable for providing information on the results of joint arthroplasty. However, a progressively increasing rate of attrition correlates with the length of study. The attrition rate of patients "lost to follow-up" ("non-attenders") may have a significant effect on the reported outcome. The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of the outcome in patients lost to follow-up on analysis in the setting of total knee arthroplasty. We found a lower rate of failure for revision surgery and higher satisfactory results in "non-attenders" compared with patients completing follow-up. No statistical effect of loss to follow-up care was noted on survivorship analysis when revision surgery or revision plus severe pain were considered as end points. Therefore, the patients who do not attend follow-up visits do not necessarily have poor results. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12629603 DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757