Literature DB >> 12629603

Outcome in patients lost to follow-up.

Atul B Joshi, Gurdev S Gill, Patricia L Smith.   

Abstract

Long-term outcome studies are valuable for providing information on the results of joint arthroplasty. However, a progressively increasing rate of attrition correlates with the length of study. The attrition rate of patients "lost to follow-up" ("non-attenders") may have a significant effect on the reported outcome. The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of the outcome in patients lost to follow-up on analysis in the setting of total knee arthroplasty. We found a lower rate of failure for revision surgery and higher satisfactory results in "non-attenders" compared with patients completing follow-up. No statistical effect of loss to follow-up care was noted on survivorship analysis when revision surgery or revision plus severe pain were considered as end points. Therefore, the patients who do not attend follow-up visits do not necessarily have poor results. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12629603     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Ten-year survival analysis of the PFC total knee arthroplasty--a surgeon's first 99 replacements.

Authors:  Alasdair J A Santini; Videsh Raut
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Survivorship of 2000 tapered titanium porous plasma-sprayed femoral components.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Thomas H Mallory; Michael D Skeels; Joanne B Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  How to deal with lost to follow-up in total knee arthroplasty : a new method based on the competing risks approach.

Authors:  Klaas-Auke Nouta; Bart G Pijls; Marta Fiocco; J Christiaan Keurentjes; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Pain relief and functional improvement remain 20 years after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; Lindsey K Meding; Merrill A Ritter; E Michael Keating
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  How are those "lost to follow-up" patients really doing? A compliance comparison in arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Jung Keun Choi; Jeffrey A Geller; David A Patrick; Wenbao Wang; William Macaulay
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

6.  Effect of Policy Change on the Use of Long-Distance Transport and Follow-Up Care for Patients With Traumatic Finger Amputations.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; Melissa J Shauver; Kevin C Chung; Aviram M Giladi
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Antonio Murcia; Ana Torres; Rafael Llopis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term survival of the uncemented Balgrist total hip replacement cup.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Jiri Lostak; Katerina Langova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Lessons learned from managing a prospective, private practice joint replacement registry: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  Joshua T Carothers; Richard E White; Krishna R Tripuraneni; Mohammad W Hattab; Michael J Archibeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient-reported outcome after fast-track hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian Larsen; Torben B Hansen; Kjeld Søballe; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.