Devyani Misra1, Na Lu1,2, David Felson1, Hyon K Choi2, John Seeger3, Thomas Einhorn1, Tuhina Neogi1, Yuqing Zhang1. 1. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relation of knee replacement (KR) surgery to all-cause mortality has not been well established owing to potential biases in previous studies. Thus, we aimed to examine the relation of KR to mortality risk among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) focusing on identifying biases that may threaten the validity of prior studies. METHODS: We included knee OA subjects (ages 50-89 years) from The Health Improvement Network, an electronic medical records database in the UK. Risk of mortality among KR subjects was compared with propensity score-matched non-KR subjects. To explore residual confounding bias, subgroup analyses stratified by age and propensity scores were performed. RESULTS: Subjects with KR had 28% lower risk of mortality than non-KR subjects (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78). However, when stratified by age, protective effect was noted only in older age groups (>63 years) but not in younger subjects (≤63 years). Further, the mortality rate among KR subjects decreased as candidacy (propensity score) for KR increased among subjects with KR, but no such consistent trend was noted among non-KR subjects. CONCLUSIONS: While a protective effect of KR on mortality cannot be ruled out, findings of lower mortality among older KR subjects and those with higher propensity scores suggest that prognosis-based selection for KR may lead to intractable confounding by indication; hence, the protective effect of KR on all-cause mortality may be overestimated. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: The relation of knee replacement (KR) surgery to all-cause mortality has not been well established owing to potential biases in previous studies. Thus, we aimed to examine the relation of KR to mortality risk among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) focusing on identifying biases that may threaten the validity of prior studies. METHODS: We included knee OA subjects (ages 50-89 years) from The Health Improvement Network, an electronic medical records database in the UK. Risk of mortality among KR subjects was compared with propensity score-matched non-KR subjects. To explore residual confounding bias, subgroup analyses stratified by age and propensity scores were performed. RESULTS: Subjects with KR had 28% lower risk of mortality than non-KR subjects (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78). However, when stratified by age, protective effect was noted only in older age groups (>63 years) but not in younger subjects (≤63 years). Further, the mortality rate among KR subjects decreased as candidacy (propensity score) for KR increased among subjects with KR, but no such consistent trend was noted among non-KR subjects. CONCLUSIONS: While a protective effect of KR on mortality cannot be ruled out, findings of lower mortality among older KR subjects and those with higher propensity scores suggest that prognosis-based selection for KR may lead to intractable confounding by indication; hence, the protective effect of KR on all-cause mortality may be overestimated. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Knee Osteoarthritis; Orthopedic Surgery; Outcomes research
Authors: Scott T Lovald; Kevin L Ong; Edmund C Lau; Jordana K Schmier; Kevin J Bozic; Steve M Kurtz Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: J M van der Waal; S D M Bot; C B Terwee; D A W M van der Windt; F G Schellevis; L M Bouter; J Dekker Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-11-03 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Pamela L Hudak; Pamela Grassau; Richard H Glazier; Gillian Hawker; Hans Kreder; Peter Coyte; Nizar Mahomed; James G Wright Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Ian A Harris; Alesha Hatton; Nicole Pratt; Michelle Lorimer; Justine M Naylor; Richard de Steiger; Peter Lewis; Stephen E Graves Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: C Zeng; T Neogi; A T Chan; J Wei; D Misra; N Lu; H K Choi; G Lei; Y Zhang Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Chao Zeng; Kim Bennell; Zidan Yang; Uyen-Sa D T Nguyen; Na Lu; Jie Wei; Guanghua Lei; Yuqing Zhang Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 19.103