Literature DB >> 21980944

Feasibility of neonatal dried blood spot retrieval amid evolving state policies (2009-2010): a Children's Oncology Group study.

Amy M Linabery1, Megan E Slater, Logan G Spector, Andrew F Olshan, Susan K Stork, Michelle A Roesler, Gregory H Reaman, Julie A Ross.   

Abstract

Dried blood spots (DBS) are collected uniformly from US newborns to test for metabolic and other disorders. Because evidence exists for prenatal origins of some diseases, DBS may provide unique prenatal exposure records. Some states retain residual DBS and permit their use in aetiological studies. The primary study aim was to assess the feasibility of obtaining residual DBS from state newborn screening programmes for paediatric and adolescent cancer patients nationwide with parental/subject consent/assent. Families of leukaemia and lymphoma patients aged ≤21 years diagnosed from 1998 to 2007 at randomly selected Children's Oncology Group institutions across the US were questioned (n = 947). Parents/guardians and patients aged ≥18 years were asked to release DBS to investigators in spring 2009. DBS were then requested from states. Overall, 299 families (32%) released DBS. Consenting/assenting patients were born in 39 US states and 46 DBS were obtained from five states; 124 DBS were unobtainable because patients were born prior to dates of state retention. State policies are rapidly evolving and there is ongoing discussion regarding DBS storage and secondary research uses. Currently, population-based DBS studies can be conducted in a limited number of states; fortunately, many have large populations to provide reasonably sized paediatric subject groups.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21980944      PMCID: PMC3664237          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01228.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  28 in total

Review 1.  Use of filter paper for the collection and analysis of human whole blood specimens.

Authors:  J V Mei; J R Alexander; B W Adam; W H Hannon
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Policy issues and stakeholder concerns regarding the storage and use of residual newborn dried blood samples for research.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2010-05-10

3.  Response rates among control subjects in case-control studies.

Authors:  M L Slattery; S L Edwards; B J Caan; R A Kerber; J D Potter
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 4.  Privacy rules for DNA databanks. Protecting coded 'future diaries'.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Newborn screening, informed consent, and future use of archived tissue samples.

Authors:  M K Pelias; N J Markward
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2001

6.  Childhood cancer patients' access to cooperative group cancer programs: a population-based study.

Authors:  Lihua Liu; Mark Krailo; Gregory H Reaman; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Not without my permission: parents' willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research.

Authors:  B A Tarini; A Goldenberg; D Singer; S J Clark; A Butchart; M M Davis
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Lina Jandorf; William Redd
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-11

Review 9.  The prenatal origin of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Taub; Yubin Ge
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2004-01

10.  Childhood cancer in the United States. A geographical analysis of cases from the Pediatric Cooperative Clinical Trials groups.

Authors:  J A Ross; R K Severson; B H Pollock; L L Robison
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  8 in total

1.  Return of Results from Research Using Newborn Screening Dried Blood Samples.

Authors:  Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Aaron J Goldenberg
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Long-term stability of folate in dried blood spots stored in several conditions.

Authors:  Rheanne K Zimmerman; Megan E Slater; Erica K Langer; Julie A Ross; Logan G Spector
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 3.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: epidemiology.

Authors:  Logan G Spector; Julie A Ross; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Research results: preserving newborn blood samples.

Authors:  Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Michael E Scheurer; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  The Prenatal Origin of Childhood Leukemia: Potential Applications for Epidemiology and Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Erin L Marcotte; Logan G Spector; Daniela P Mendes-de-Almeida; Heather H Nelson
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 6.  Using primary teeth and archived dried spots for exposomic studies in children: Exploring new paths in the environmental epidemiology of pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Philip J Lupo; Lauren M Petrick; Thanh T Hoang; Amanda E Janitz; Erin L Marcotte; Jeremy M Schraw; Manish Arora; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.653

7.  Eliciting parental support for the use of newborn blood spots for pediatric research.

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Germaine Buck Louis; David Lawrence; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Alexander C McLain; Michele Caggana; Charlotte Druschel; Erin Bell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 11.069

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.