Literature DB >> 11788082

Newborn screening, informed consent, and future use of archived tissue samples.

M K Pelias1, N J Markward.   

Abstract

Recent advances in genetic technologies have combined with established protocols for genetic screening to provide immense benefits to individuals and the public. In most American jurisdictions, newborn screening is mandated by law and does not require parental consent for the collection or testing of the blood samples. Screening programs have been successful in identifying affected infants at an early stage for effective treatment of some genetic diseases. The public health benefit of screening programs is recognized and affirmed. However, collections of surplus, stored samples have become immensely attractive to researchers in medical genetics and the biomedical sciences. As geneticists have sought access to the newborn screening samples, they have recognized concerns related to whether they should use the samples, and, if so, under what conditions. This paper addresses the ethical issues associated with genetic screening and recommends an informed consent protocol that may be used to balance individual and parental rights with the interests of researchers who wish to use surplus samples in studies of genetic disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11788082     DOI: 10.1089/10906570152742218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  6 in total

Review 1.  Can the four principles help in genetic screening decision-making?

Authors:  Pierre Mallia; Henk ten Have
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-06

2.  Parents' decisions to screen newborns for FMR1 gene expansions in a pilot research project.

Authors:  Debra Skinner; Summer Choudhury; John Sideris; Sonia Guarda; Allen Buansi; Myra Roche; Cynthia Powell; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Storage and use of Newborn Screening Blood Specimens for Research: Assessing Public Opinion in Illinois.

Authors:  Alexa Hart; Michael Petros; Joel Charrow; Claudia Nash; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Feasibility of neonatal dried blood spot retrieval amid evolving state policies (2009-2010): a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Amy M Linabery; Megan E Slater; Logan G Spector; Andrew F Olshan; Susan K Stork; Michelle A Roesler; Gregory H Reaman; Julie A Ross
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Ethics, genetics and public policies in Uruguay: newborn and infant screening as a paradigm.

Authors:  Mariela Larrandaburu; Ursula Matte; Ana Noble; Zully Olivera; Maria Teresa V Sanseverino; Luis Nacul; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-29

6.  Concerns of newborn blood screening advisory committee members regarding storage and use of residual newborn screening blood spots.

Authors:  Erin W Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Matthew J Burbank; Aaron J Goldenberg; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Louisa A Stark; Bob Wong; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.