Literature DB >> 7606315

Response rates among control subjects in case-control studies.

M L Slattery1, S L Edwards, B J Caan, R A Kerber, J D Potter.   

Abstract

Response rates are an important component of epidemiologic research. The purposes of this study are (a) to evaluate how response rates are defined and calculated for control subjects in epidemiologic case-control studies, and (b) to explore factors that may impact response in epidemiologic studies. Our results show that the method of control subject selection has an impact on study response. Gender of respondent does not appear to impact response rates. However, response rates are generally worse for individuals less than 45 years old. Methods used to calculate response have a great impact on "response rate"; therefore, it is important for researchers to define exactly what the reported response rates represent and how they are derived so that data can be interpreted appropriately.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7606315     DOI: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)00113-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  42 in total

1.  Nonresponse research--an underdeveloped field in epidemiology.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Prevalence of intimate partner violence among an abortion clinic population.

Authors:  Audrey F Saftlas; Anne B Wallis; Tara Shochet; Karisa K Harland; Penny Dickey; Corinne Peek-Asa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Comparison of address-based sampling and random-digit dialing methods for recruiting young men as controls in a case-control study of testicular cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Bartholt Clagett; Katherine L Nathanson; Stephanie L Ciosek; Monique McDermoth; David J Vaughn; Nandita Mitra; Andrew Weiss; Rachel Martonik; Peter A Kanetsky
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Correction of systematic bias in ultrasound dating in studies of small-for-gestational-age birth: an example from the Iowa Health in Pregnancy Study.

Authors:  Karisa K Harland; Audrey F Saftlas; Anne B Wallis; Jerome Yankowitz; Elizabeth W Triche; M Bridget Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Risk factors for maternal injuries in a population-based sample of pregnant women.

Authors:  Karisa K Harland; Audrey F Saftlas; Jerome Yankowitz; Corinne Peek-Asa
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Dietary patterns and colon cancer risk in Whites and African Americans in the North Carolina Colon Cancer Study.

Authors:  Jessie A Satia; Marilyn Tseng; Joseph A Galanko; Christopher Martin; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.900

7.  Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infections in rural michigan: a prospective case-control study.

Authors:  Rachel Church Potter; John B Kaneene; William N Hall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A case-control study: occupational cooking and the risk of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt-Pokrzywniak; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Anja Marr; Norbert Bornfeld; Andreas Stang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Day care, childhood infections, and risk of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Florence Menegaux; Andrew F Olshan; Joseph P Neglia; Brad H Pollock; Melissa L Bondy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Comparability and representativeness of control groups in a case-control study of infant leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Susan E Puumala; Logan G Spector; Leslie L Robison; Greta R Bunin; Andrew F Olshan; Amy M Linabery; Michelle A Roesler; Cindy K Blair; Julie A Ross
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.