Literature DB >> 21978445

Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.

Arthur E Burgess1.   

Abstract

Most academic radiologists will be familiar with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies. Fundamental studies of human observer performance are now usually performed by forced-choice methods. Both methods are based on signal detection theory. The ROC method gives an operating curve of true-positive versus false-positive probabilities. The area under the curve, A(Z), can be used a summary performance measure. In the forced-choice method, observers are given 2 or more images with one containing the signal. The observer's task is to select the option most likely to contain the signal. The percentage of correct responses, PC, is a summary performance measure. Precise comparison of the 2 methods is limited to very controlled experiments in which signals (simulated lesions for example) are carefully designed and detection or discrimination is limited by true random noise. Under these conditions, theory predicts a simple relationship between summary measures and human results are consistent with theory. There will be a description of forced-choice experimental methods and data analysis. There has also been considerable work on development of theoretic observer models. Human experiment results have used to evaluate the models. Models that correlate well with human performance in turn can be used for preliminary design of new imaging systems and for selection of image quality metrics for comparing equipment performance, this article will provide a summary of work during the last 30 years on evaluating human signal detection capabilities, observer models and image quality metrics.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978445     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  18 in total

1.  Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Brendan L Eck; Rachid Fahmi; Kevin M Brown; Stanislav Zabic; Nilgoun Raihani; Jun Miao; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Validation of a Projection-domain Insertion of Liver Lesions into CT Images.

Authors:  Baiyu Chen; Chi Ma; Shuai Leng; Jeff L Fidler; Shannon P Sheedy; Cynthia H McCollough; Joel G Fletcher; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Retina-V1 model of detectability across the visual field.

Authors:  Chris Bradley; Jared Abrams; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Constrained sampling experiments reveal principles of detection in natural scenes.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Jared Abrams; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Correlation between human detection accuracy and observer model-based image quality metrics in computed tomography.

Authors:  Justin Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-09-22

7.  Foveated Model Observers to predict human performance in 3D images.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-10

8.  Predicting detection performance with model observers: Fourier domain or spatial domain?

Authors:  Baiyu Chen; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; James Kofler; Christopher Favazza; Thomas Vrieze; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-30

9.  An expert advantage in detecting unfamiliar visual signals in noise.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Roadmap toward the 10 ps time-of-flight PET challenge.

Authors:  Paul Lecoq; Christian Morel; John O Prior; Dimitris Visvikis; Stefan Gundacker; Etiennette Auffray; Peter Križan; Rosana Martinez Turtos; Dominique Thers; Edoardo Charbon; Joao Varela; Christophe de La Taille; Angelo Rivetti; Dominique Breton; Jean-François Pratte; Johan Nuyts; Suleman Surti; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Paul Marsden; Katia Parodi; Jose Maria Benlloch; Mathieu Benoit
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.