Literature DB >> 21973360

Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Jeff Carroll1, Stephanie Tiaden, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users have been shown to benefit from residual low-frequency hearing, specifically in pitch related tasks. It remains unclear whether this benefit is dependent on fundamental frequency (F0) or other acoustic cues. Three experiments were conducted to determine the role of F0, as well as its frequency modulated (FM) and amplitude modulated (AM) components, in speech recognition with a competing voice. In simulated CI listeners, the signal-to-noise ratio was varied to estimate the 50% correct response. Simulation results showed that the F0 cue contributes to a significant proportion of the benefit seen with combined acoustic and electric hearing, and additionally that this benefit is due to the FM rather than the AM component. In actual CI users, sentence recognition scores were collected with either the full F0 cue containing both the FM and AM components or the 500-Hz low-pass speech cue containing the F0 and additional harmonics. The F0 cue provided a benefit similar to the low-pass cue for speech in noise, but not in quiet. Poorer CI users benefited more from the F0 cue than better users. These findings suggest that F0 is critical to improving speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21973360      PMCID: PMC3206909          DOI: 10.1121/1.3631563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

Review 1.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Qian-Jie Fu; John Galvin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05

2.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng; Ruth Litovsky; Peter Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  B Townshend; N Cotter; D Van Compernolle; R L White
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  K W Grant; L H Ardell; P K Kuhl; D W Sparks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speechreading supplemented with frequency-selective sound-pressure information.

Authors:  M Breeuwer; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Voice pitch as an aid to lipreading.

Authors:  S M Rosen; A J Fourcin; B C Moore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-05-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the roles of spectral detail and intonation contour in speech intelligibility: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Jeong S Kyong; Sophie K Scott; Stuart Rosen; Timothy B Howe; Zarinah K Agnew; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Amanda Caldwell; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Soo Hee Oh; Gail S Donaldson; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; René H Gifford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant-based research platform for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hussnain Ali; Arthur P Lobo; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Brief Report: Speech-in-Noise Recognition and the Relation to Vocal Pitch Perception in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development.

Authors:  Stefanie Schelinski; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-01

Review 9.  The organization and physiology of the auditory thalamus and its role in processing acoustic features important for speech perception.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.

Authors:  Soo Hee Oh; Gail S Donaldson; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.