Literature DB >> 3973238

The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects.

K W Grant, L H Ardell, P K Kuhl, D W Sparks.   

Abstract

The ability to combine speechreading (i.e., lipreading) with prosodic information extracted from the low-frequency regions of speech was evaluated with three normally hearing subjects. The subjects were tested in a connected discourse tracking procedure which measures the rate at which spoken text can be repeated back without any errors. Receptive conditions included speechreading alone (SA), speechreading plus amplitude envelope cues (AM), speechreading plus fundamental frequency cues (FM), and speechreading plus intensity-modulated fundamental frequency cues (AM + FM). In a second experiment, one subject was further tested in a speechreading plus voicing duration cue condition (DUR). Speechreading performance was best in the AM + FM condition (83.6 words per minute,) and worst in the SA condition (41.1 words per minute). Tracking levels in the AM, FM, and DUR conditions were 73.7, 73.6, and 65.4 words per minute, respectively. The average tracking rate obtained when subjects were allowed to listen to the talker's normal (unfiltered) speech (NS condition) was 108.3 words per minute. These results demonstrate that speechreaders can use information related to the rhythm, stress, and intonation patterns of speech to improve their speechreading performance.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3973238     DOI: 10.1121/1.392335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Stephanie Tiaden; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

3.  Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech.

Authors:  P C Gordon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

4.  Auditory-visual fusion in speech perception in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Efrat A Schorr; Nathan A Fox; Virginie van Wassenhove; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cortical integration of audio-visual speech and non-speech stimuli.

Authors:  Brent C Vander Wyk; Gordon J Ramsay; Caitlin M Hudac; Warren Jones; David Lin; Ami Klin; Su Mei Lee; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Controller design and consonantal contrast coding using a multi-finger tactual display.

Authors:  Ali Israr; Peter H Meckl; Charlotte M Reed; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The contribution of visual information to the perception of speech in noise with and without informative temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Paula C Stacey; Pádraig T Kitterick; Saffron D Morris; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Assessing the effect of physical differences in the articulation of consonants and vowels on audiovisual temporal perception.

Authors:  Argiro Vatakis; Petros Maragos; Isidoros Rodomagoulakis; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.