Literature DB >> 27106322

The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.

Soo Hee Oh1, Gail S Donaldson1, Ying-Yee Kong2.   

Abstract

Low-frequency acoustic cues have been shown to enhance speech perception by cochlear-implant users, particularly when target speech occurs in a competing background. The present study examined the extent to which a continuous representation of low-frequency harmonicity cues contributes to bimodal benefit in simulated bimodal listeners. Experiment 1 examined the benefit of restoring a continuous temporal envelope to the low-frequency ear while the vocoder ear received a temporally interrupted stimulus. Experiment 2 examined the effect of providing continuous harmonicity cues in the low-frequency ear as compared to restoring a continuous temporal envelope in the vocoder ear. Findings indicate that bimodal benefit for temporally interrupted speech increases when continuity is restored to either or both ears. The primary benefit appears to stem from the continuous temporal envelope in the low-frequency region providing additional phonetic cues related to manner and F1 frequency; a secondary contribution is provided by low-frequency harmonicity cues when a continuous representation of the temporal envelope is present in the low-frequency, or both ears. The continuous temporal envelope and harmonicity cues of low-frequency speech are thought to support bimodal benefit by facilitating identification of word and syllable boundaries, and by restoring partial phonetic cues that occur during gaps in the temporally interrupted stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106322      PMCID: PMC4833731          DOI: 10.1121/1.4945747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other.

Authors:  Tova Most; Tamar Harel; Talma Shpak; Michal Luntz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Anisa S Visram; Mahan Azadpour; Karolina Kluk; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Kathleen F Faulkner; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS.

Authors:  Rene H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Hear Sci       Date:  2012-05-01

10.  Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.

Authors:  Anisa S Visram; Karolina Kluk; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.

Authors:  Christian Stilp; Gail Donaldson; Soohee Oh; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.