Literature DB >> 6491042

Speechreading supplemented with frequency-selective sound-pressure information.

M Breeuwer, R Plomp.   

Abstract

The benefit of supplementing speechreading with frequency-selective sound-pressure information was studied by auditorily presenting this information to normal-hearing listeners. The sound-pressure levels in one or two frequency bands of the speech signal with center frequencies of 500, 1600, and 3160 Hz, respectively, and with 1- or 1/3-oct bandwidth were used to amplitude-modulate pure-tone carriers with frequencies equal to the center frequencies of the filter bands. Short sentences were presented to 18 normal-hearing listeners under the conditions of speechreading-only and speechreading combined with the sound-pressure information. The mean number of correctly perceived syllables increased from 22.8% for speechreading-only to 65.7% when sound-pressure information was supplied in a single 1-oct band at 500 Hz and to 86.7% with two 1-oct bands at 500 and 3160 Hz, respectively. The latter signal scored only 26.7% correct syllables without accompanying visual information.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6491042     DOI: 10.1121/1.391255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Stephanie Tiaden; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

5.  Band importance for sentences and words reexamined.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cross-linguistic comparisons in the integration of visual and auditory speech.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen; P M Smeele
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-01

7.  On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Sean R Mills; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.