Literature DB >> 20430078

Patterned tone sequences reveal non-linear interactions in auditory spectrotemporal receptive fields in the inferior colliculus.

W Owen Brimijoin1, William E O'Neill.   

Abstract

Linear measures of auditory receptive fields do not always fully account for a neuron's response to spectrotemporally-complex signals such as frequency-modulated sweeps (FM) and communication sounds. A possible source of this discrepancy is cross-frequency interactions, common response properties which may be missed by linear receptive fields but captured using two-tone masking. Using a patterned tonal sequence that included a balanced set of all possible tone-to-tone transitions, we have here combined the spectrotemporal receptive field with two-tone masking to measure spectrotemporal response maps (STRM). Recording from single units in the mustached bat inferior colliculus, we found significant non-linear interactions between sequential tones in all sampled units. In particular, tone-pair STRMs revealed three common features not visible in linear single-tone STRMs: 1) two-tone facilitative interactions, 2) frequency-specific suppression, and 3) post-stimulatory suppression in the absence of spiking. We also found a correlative relationship between these nonlinear receptive field features and sensitivity for different rates and directions of FM sweeps, dynamic features found in many vocalizations, including speech. The overwhelming prevalence of cross-frequency interactions revealed by this technique provides further evidence of the central auditory system's role as a pattern-detector, and underscores the need to include nonlinearity in measures of the receptive field. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20430078      PMCID: PMC3978381          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  72 in total

1.  Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Nonlinear spectrotemporal sound analysis by neurons in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Monty A Escabi; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Mark N Kvale; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Linearity of cortical receptive fields measured with natural sounds.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Michael S Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Methods for the analysis of auditory processing in the brain.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Sarah M N Woolley; Anne Hsu; Thane Fremouw
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Stimulus dependence of spectro-temporal receptive fields in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pamela A Valentine; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Synaptic events and discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus cells. II. Frequency-modulated tones.

Authors:  R Britt; A Starr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Coding and processing in the auditory systems of FM-signal-producing bats.

Authors:  N Suga; P Schlegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Analysis of frequency-modulated sounds by auditory neurones of echo-locating bats.

Authors:  N Suga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Neurophysiological studies on echolocation systems in awake bats producing CF-FM orientation sounds.

Authors:  N Suga; J A Simmons; T Shimozawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Facilitatory mechanisms shape selectivity for the rate and direction of FM sweeps in the inferior colliculus of the pallid bat.

Authors:  Anthony J Williams; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  de Bruijn cycles for neural decoding.

Authors:  Geoffrey Karl Aguirre; Marcelo Gomes Mattar; Lucía Magis-Weinberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Natural Statistics as Inference Principles of Auditory Tuning in Biological and Artificial Midbrain Networks.

Authors:  Sangwook Park; Angeles Salles; Kathryne Allen; Cynthia F Moss; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-06-16

5.  Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific.

Authors:  Chris Scholes; Alan R Palmer; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Inter-trial effects in visual pop-out search: Factorial comparison of Bayesian updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Describing complex cells in primary visual cortex: a comparison of context and multifilter LN models.

Authors:  Johan Westö; Patrick J C May
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.714

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.