Literature DB >> 12522195

Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain.

Julie A Grace1, Noopur Amin, Nandini C Singh, Frédéric E Theunissen.   

Abstract

The selectivity of neurons in the zebra finch auditory forebrain for natural sounds was investigated systematically. The principal auditory forebrain area in songbirds consists of the tonotopically organized field L complex, which, by its location in the auditory processing stream, can be compared with the auditory cortex of mammals. We also recorded from a secondary auditory area, cHV. Field L and cHV are auditory processing stages that are presynaptic to the specialized song system nuclei where auditory neurons show an extremely selective response for the bird's own song, but weak response to almost any other sounds, including conspecific songs. In our study, we found that neurons in field L and cHV had stronger responses to conspecific song than to synthetic sounds that were designed to match the lower order acoustical properties of song, such as their overall power spectra and AM spectra. Such preferential responses to natural sounds cannot be explained by linear frequency tuning or simple nonlinear intensity tuning and requires linear or nonlinear spectro-temporal neuronal transfer functions tuned to the acoustical properties of song. The selectivity for conspecific songs in field L and cHV might reflect an intermediate auditory processing stage for vocalizations that then contributes to the generation of the very specific selectivity for the bird's own song seen in the postsynaptic song system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12522195     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00088.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  73 in total

1.  Neural response to bird's own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium.

Authors:  N Amin; J A Grace; F E Theunissen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Functional differences in forebrain auditory regions during learned vocal recognition in songbirds.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Stewart H Hulse; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-01

4.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Hierarchical emergence of sequence sensitivity in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Satoko Ono; Kazuo Okanoya; Yoshimasa Seki
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Meaning in the avian auditory cortex: neural representation of communication calls.

Authors:  Julie E Elie; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Modulation power and phase spectrum of natural sounds enhance neural encoding performed by single auditory neurons.

Authors:  Anne Hsu; Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cortical discrimination of complex natural stimuli: can single neurons match behavior?

Authors:  Le Wang; Rajiv Narayan; Gilberto Graña; Maoz Shamir; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech.

Authors:  Eric D Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A generalized mechanism for perception of pitch patterns.

Authors:  Psyche Loui; Elaine H Wu; David L Wessel; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.