Literature DB >> 21958655

Evoked-potential changes following discrimination learning involving complex sounds.

Itzel Orduña1, Estella H Liu, Barbara A Church, Ann C Eddins, Eduardo Mercado.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Perceptual sensitivities are malleable via learning, even in adults. We trained adults to discriminate complex sounds (periodic, frequency-modulated sweep trains) using two different training procedures, and used psychoacoustic tests and evoked potential measures (the N1-P2 complex) to assess changes in both perceptual and neural sensitivities.
METHODS: Training took place either on a single day, or daily across eight days, and involved discrimination of pairs of stimuli using a single-interval, forced-choice task. In some participants, training started with dissimilar pairs that became progressively more similar across sessions, whereas in others training was constant, involving only one, highly similar, stimulus pair.
RESULTS: Participants were better able to discriminate the complex sounds after training, particularly after progressive training, and the evoked potentials elicited by some of the sounds increased in amplitude following training. Significant amplitude changes were restricted to the P2 peak.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that changes in perceptual sensitivities parallel enhanced neural processing. SIGNIFICANCE: These results are consistent with the proposal that changes in perceptual abilities arise from the brain's capacity to adaptively modify cortical representations of sensory stimuli, and that different training regimens can lead to differences in cortical sensitivities, even after relatively short periods of training.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958655      PMCID: PMC3277806          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  32 in total

1.  Learning to perceive pitch differences.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Mercedes Atienza; Jose L Cantero; Elena Dominguez-Marin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Training improves acoustic pattern perception.

Authors:  Jessica M Foxton; Andrew C B Brown; Simon Chambers; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training.

Authors:  N Kraus; T McGee; T D Carrell; C King; K Tremblay; T Nicol
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the preeminence of temporal processing.

Authors:  P Tallal; S Miller; R H Fitch
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-06-14       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Analysis of frequency-modulated and complex sounds by single auditory neurones of bats.

Authors:  N Suga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Acoustic signaling in the black rat (Rattus rattus).

Authors:  M T Kaltwasser
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Vocal repertoire of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), its analysis and significance.

Authors:  P Winter; D Ploog; J Latta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Antoine J Shahin; Terence Picton; Bernhard Ross
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  9 in total

1.  Temporal dynamics in auditory perceptual learning: impact of sequencing and incidental learning.

Authors:  Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado; Matthew G Wisniewski; Estella H Liu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Easy-to-hard effects in perceptual learning depend upon the degree to which initial trials are "easy".

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado; Milen L Radell; Alexandria C Zakrzewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

3.  Predicting favorable and unfavorable consequences of perceptual learning: worsening and the peak shift.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of Long-Term Musical Training on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Eun-Kyung Jeon; Virginia Driscoll; Bruna Mussoi; Shruti Balvalli Deshpande; Kate Gfeller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps by mice.

Authors:  Laurel A Screven; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Is the auditory evoked P2 response a biomarker of learning?

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Bernhard Ross; Kayo Inoue; Katrina McClannahan; Gregory Collet
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-20

7.  Brain dynamics that correlate with effects of learning on auditory distance perception.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Eduardo Mercado; Barbara A Church; Klaus Gramann; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Commentary: Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Barbara A Church; Amanda M Seccia
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25

9.  Benefits of fading in perceptual learning are driven by more than dimensional attention.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Milen L Radell; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.