Literature DB >> 11931315

Learning to perceive pitch differences.

Laurent Demany1, Catherine Semal.   

Abstract

This paper reports two experiments concerning the stimulus specificity of pitch discrimination learning. In experiment 1, listeners were initially trained, during ten sessions (about 11,000 trials), to discriminate a monaural pure tone of 3000 Hz from ipsilateral pure tones with slightly different frequencies. The resulting perceptual learning (improvement in discrimination thresholds) appeared to be frequency-specific since, in subsequent sessions, new learning was observed when the 3000-Hz standard tone was replaced by a standard tone of 1200 Hz, or 6500 Hz. By contrast, a subsequent presentation of the initial tones to the contralateral ear showed that the initial learning was not, or was only weakly, ear-specific. In experiment 2, training in pitch discrimination was initially provided using complex tones that consisted of harmonics 3-7 of a missing fundamental (near 100 Hz for some listeners, 500 Hz for others). Subsequently, the standard complex was replaced by a standard pure tone with a frequency which could be either equal to the standard complex's missing fundamental or remote from it. In the former case, the two standard stimuli were matched in pitch. However, this perceptual relationship did not appear to favor the transfer of learning. Therefore, the results indicated that pitch discrimination learning is, at least to some extent, timbre-specific, and cannot be viewed as a reduction of an internal noise which would affect directly the output of a neural device extracting pitch from both pure tones and complex tones including low-rank harmonics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931315     DOI: 10.1121/1.1445791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Evoked-potential changes following discrimination learning involving complex sounds.

Authors:  Itzel Orduña; Estella H Liu; Barbara A Church; Ann C Eddins; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Generalization of frequency discrimination learning across frequencies and ears: implications for underlying neural mechanisms in humans.

Authors:  Karine Delhommeau; Christophe Micheyl; Roland Jouvent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

Review 4.  A review of the generalization of auditory learning.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Yuxuan Zhang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Learning for pitch and melody discrimination in congenital amusia.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  From comparison to classification: a cortical tool for boosting perception.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Luba Daikhin; Yedida Lubin; Yamit Cohen; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Contributions of procedure and stimulus learning to early, rapid perceptual improvements.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.