Literature DB >> 22642235

Temporal dynamics in auditory perceptual learning: impact of sequencing and incidental learning.

Barbara A Church1, Eduardo Mercado, Matthew G Wisniewski, Estella H Liu.   

Abstract

Training can improve perceptual sensitivities. We examined whether the temporal dynamics and the incidental versus intentional nature of training are important. Within the context of a birdsong rate discrimination task, we examined whether the sequencing of pretesting exposure to the stimuli mattered. Easy-to-hard (progressive) sequencing of stimuli during preexposure led to a more accurate performance with the critical difficult contrast and greater generalization to new contrasts in the task, compared with equally variable training in either a random or an antiprogressive order. This greater accuracy was also evident when participants experienced the progressively sequenced stimuli in a different incidental learning task that did not involve direct auditory training. The results clearly show the importance of temporal dynamics (sequencing) in learning and show that the progressive training advantages cannot be fully explained by direct associations between stimulus features and the corresponding responses. The current findings are consistent with a hierarchical account of perceptual learning, among other possibilities, but not with explanations that focus on stimulus variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642235      PMCID: PMC3673570          DOI: 10.1037/a0028647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  24 in total

1.  Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

3.  Evoked-potential changes following discrimination learning involving complex sounds.

Authors:  Itzel Orduña; Estella H Liu; Barbara A Church; Ann C Eddins; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Learned industriousness.

Authors:  R Eisenberger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Training new, nonnative speech contrasts: a comparison of the prototype and perceptual fading techniques.

Authors:  D G Jamieson; D E Morosan
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1989-03

6.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; D B Pisoni; R A Yamada; Y Tohkura; T Yamada
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  On short and long auditory stores.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Transfer of discrimination.

Authors:  F A Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-04

9.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training.

Authors:  M M Merzenich; W M Jenkins; P Johnston; C Schreiner; S L Miller; P Tallal
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Jessica E D Alexander; Sabrina K Sidaras; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Easy-to-hard effects in perceptual learning depend upon the degree to which initial trials are "easy".

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado; Milen L Radell; Alexandria C Zakrzewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

3.  Predicting favorable and unfavorable consequences of perceptual learning: worsening and the peak shift.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of auditory training on low-pass filtered speech perception and listening-related cognitive load.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Alexandria C Zakrzewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Adaptive plasticity in speech perception: Effects of external information and internal predictions.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Brain dynamics that correlate with effects of learning on auditory distance perception.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Eduardo Mercado; Barbara A Church; Klaus Gramann; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  The easy-to-hard training advantage with real-world medical images.

Authors:  Brett D Roads; Buyun Xu; June K Robinson; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-10-03

8.  Benefits of fading in perceptual learning are driven by more than dimensional attention.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Milen L Radell; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.