OBJECTIVES: Residual methyl methacrylate (MMA) may leach from the acrylic resin denture bases and have adverse effects on the oral mucosa. This in vitro study evaluated and correlated the effect of the leaching residual MMA concentrations ([MMA]r) on in vitro cytotoxicity of L-929 fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 144 heat-polymerized acrylic resin specimens were fabricated using 4 different polymerization cycles: (1) at 74ºC for 9 h, (2) at 74ºC for 9 h and terminal boiling (at 100ºC) for 30 min, (3) at 74ºC for 9 h and terminal boiling for 3 h, (4) at 74ºC for 30 min and terminal boiling for 30 min. Specimens were eluted in a complete cell culture medium at 37ºC for 1, 2, 5 and 7 days. [MMA]r in eluates was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. In vitro cytotoxicity of eluates on L-929 fibroblasts was evaluated by means of cell proliferation using a tetrazolium salt XTT (sodium 3´-[1-phenyl-aminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]bis(4-methoxy-6-nitro)benzenesulphonic acid) assay. Differences in [MMA]r of eluates and cell proliferation values between polymerization cycles were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman and Dunn's multiple comparison tests. The correlation between [MMA]r of eluates and cell proliferation was analyzed by Pearson's correlation test (p<0.05). RESULTS: [MMA]r was significantly (p<0.001) higher in eluates of specimens polymerized with cycle without terminal boiling after elution of 1 and 2 days. Cell proliferation values for all cycles were significantly (p<0.01) lower in eluates of 1 day than those of 2 days. The correlation between [MMA]r and cell proliferation values was negative after all elution periods, showing significance (p<0.05) for elution of 1 and 2 days. MMA continued to leach from acrylic resin throughout 7 days and leaching concentrations markedly reduced after elution of 1 and 2 days. CONCLUSION: Due to reduction of leaching residual MMA concentrations, use of terminal boiling in the polymerization process for at least 30 min and water storage of the heat-polymerized denture bases for at least 1 to 2 days before denture delivery is clinically recommended for minimizing the residual MMA and possible cytotoxic effects.
OBJECTIVES: Residual methyl methacrylate (MMA) may leach from the acrylic resin denture bases and have adverse effects on the oral mucosa. This in vitro study evaluated and correlated the effect of the leaching residual MMA concentrations ([MMA]r) on in vitro cytotoxicity of L-929 fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 144 heat-polymerized acrylic resin specimens were fabricated using 4 different polymerization cycles: (1) at 74ºC for 9 h, (2) at 74ºC for 9 h and terminal boiling (at 100ºC) for 30 min, (3) at 74ºC for 9 h and terminal boiling for 3 h, (4) at 74ºC for 30 min and terminal boiling for 30 min. Specimens were eluted in a complete cell culture medium at 37ºC for 1, 2, 5 and 7 days. [MMA]r in eluates was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. In vitro cytotoxicity of eluates on L-929 fibroblasts was evaluated by means of cell proliferation using a tetrazolium salt XTT (sodium 3´-[1-phenyl-aminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]bis(4-methoxy-6-nitro)benzenesulphonic acid) assay. Differences in [MMA]r of eluates and cell proliferation values between polymerization cycles were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman and Dunn's multiple comparison tests. The correlation between [MMA]r of eluates and cell proliferation was analyzed by Pearson's correlation test (p<0.05). RESULTS: [MMA]r was significantly (p<0.001) higher in eluates of specimens polymerized with cycle without terminal boiling after elution of 1 and 2 days. Cell proliferation values for all cycles were significantly (p<0.01) lower in eluates of 1 day than those of 2 days. The correlation between [MMA]r and cell proliferation values was negative after all elution periods, showing significance (p<0.05) for elution of 1 and 2 days. MMA continued to leach from acrylic resin throughout 7 days and leaching concentrations markedly reduced after elution of 1 and 2 days. CONCLUSION: Due to reduction of leaching residual MMA concentrations, use of terminal boiling in the polymerization process for at least 30 min and water storage of the heat-polymerized denture bases for at least 1 to 2 days before denture delivery is clinically recommended for minimizing the residual MMA and possible cytotoxic effects.
Heat-polymerization is the most widely used method of polymerization for acrylicresin denture base fabrication and usually is accomplished in a heated
water-bath[10,12,26].The nature and duration of the conditions to which the molded acrylic resin subjected
is described as the polymerization cycle[14,26]. The conventional
method of polymerization cycle is a long, slow-temperature water-bath polymerization
where the heat-polymerization of acrylic resin is processed for 9 h at
74ºC[26]. There are also
post-polymerization cycles such as terminal boiling at 100ºC for durations of 30 min
(short-term) or longer than 1 h (long-term)[10,12,14,32].
Furthermore, it has been reported that total polymerization time shorter than 2 h is
widely preferred than the long polymerization cycles[3].Although there has been several reported variations of polymerization temperature and
time, the conversion of monomer is not complete and this might result in unreacted,
residual monomer in the denture base acrylic resin[2-5,10,12,14,25]. Methyl methacrylate (MMA) was the predominant
residual monomer in the acrylic resin[32]. In addition, it has been stated that the residual MMA content
might change due to polymerization method[4,5,31] and cycle[10,12,14,25,32].Denture base is in continuous contact with the great part of the oral mucosa. It is
important to evaluate the effect of the residual monomer, which has been shown to
leach into water[21,31,32],
saliva[2,4,30] or
artificial saliva[20], on the oral
mucosa that is adjacent to the denture base. Leaching residual monomer have been
suggested as potentially high enough to cause irritation of oral mucosa, irritation
or even an allergic reaction. This might especially be important for patients with
infected, inflamed or lacerated mucosa[11,23].In vitro cytotoxic effects of denture base acrylic resins have also
been attributed to the leaching components[4,8,15,17-19,22-24,30]. Although there are a number of reports of
in vitro cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins, which
were processed with various polymerization methods and cycles[8,11,16-19,22-24,30], there is no available study that correlated in
vitro cytotoxicity and the leaching concentrations of residual MMA
([MMA]r) of heat-polymerized denture base acrylic resin, processed
with different polymerization cycles. The aims of the present study were to evaluate
1) [MMA]r, 2) in vitro cytotoxicity, 3) the correlation
between the leaching [MMA]r and in vitro cytotoxicity of
heat-polymerized specimens, polymerized with different polymerization cycles after
elution in a cell culture medium for 1, 2, 5 and 7 days. The hypothesis was that
terminal boiling would reduce the leaching [MMA]r and in
vitro cytotoxicity of heat-polymerized denture base acrylic resin.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Specimen preparation
Stainless steel discs (1 mm thick x 10 mm diameter)[22-24] were
conventionally molded in Type II dental stone (Moldano, Heraus Kulzer, Germany)
with a powder/liquid ratio of 100 g/30 mL under aseptic conditions. Flasks were
kept under hydraulic pressure (Kavo Elektrotechnisches Werk, GmBH, Allgäu,
Germany) of 2 atm for 45 min.Heat-polymerizing, PMMA based denture base acrylic resin (Meliodent Heat-cure
Denture Base Material; Heraus Kulzer GmBH&Co., Hanau, Germany) without
cadmium was tested in the present study. Acrylic resin was mixed in accordance
with manufacturers' recommendations, with a powder/liquid ratio of 23.4 g/10 mL
for 60 s at room temperature (23&2ºC). After 5 min of doughing time,
unpolymerized resin was packed in molds and then flasks were kept under
hydraulic pressure of 2 atm for 45 min.Heat-polymerization was performed in thermostatically controlled water bath (Kavo
EWL Typ 5506; Kavo Elektronisches Werk) with 4 different polymerization cycles
(Figure 1). After completion of the
polymerization cycles, the flasks were cooled at room temperature (23±2ºC) for 2
h. Specimens were transferred into sterile centrifuge tubes (TPP Centrifuge
Tubes, Switzerland), containing 50 mL of distilled water at room temperature
(23±2ºC) and then ultrasonically cleaned (Metu Elektromekanik; Ultrasonic
Cleaner, Istanbul, Turkey) for 5 min[16-19].
Figure 1
Polymerization cycles used
Code
Polymerization cycle
H1
at 74ºC, for 9 h
(Conventional)
H2
at 74ºC, for 9 h
+
at 100ºC, for 30 min
(Short-term terminal boil)
H3
at 74ºC, for 9 h
+
at 100ºC, for 3 h
(Long-term terminal boil)
H4a
at 74ºC, for 30 min
+
at 100ºC, for 30 min
(Short-term polymerization)
recommended polymerization cycle by the manufacturer
Polymerization cycles usedrecommended polymerization cycle by the manufacturerThirty six (n=36) acrylic resins specimens were fabricated for each
polymerization cycle with a total of 144 specimens.
Eluate preparation
Complete cell culture medium without serum[11] was used as elution medium. Eluates of specimens were
prepared by placing 3 disks into a sterile vial with 9 mL[11,17] of Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM)/ F-12
(Biological Industries, Haemek, Israel) supplemented with 1% antibiotics
solution (100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 25 µg/mL Amfoterisin-B;
Biological Industries), 1% vitamin solution (MEM-Vitamins Solution 100X;
Biological Industries), 2% non-essential amino acid solution (MEM-Eagle
non-essential amino acid solution 100X; Biological Industries), and 1%
L-Glutamine (L-Glutamine Solution; 200 mM, Biological Industries). The DMEM was
maintained at pH 7.3 by adding 25 mM HEPES (HEPES BUFFER; Biological
Industries)[7]. The
ratio of surface area of the discs to the volume of culture medium was 0,626
cm[2]/mL and was within
the range 0.5-6.0 cm[2]/mL as
recommended by the International Standards Organization (ISO) 10993-5[13].Specimens were eluted with complete cell culture medium at 37ºC for 1, 2, 5 and 7
days in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air. After each
elution period, the eluates were removed and the specimens were transferred into
new vials and fresh cell culture medium. Cell culture media without acrylicresin specimens were also incubated to serve as negative controls[11,16-19]. Eluates were
filtered for sterilization and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS Heat-inactivated;
Biological Industries) were added. Eluates were stored at -20ºC until the
determination of the concentration of leaching residual MMA and in
vitro cytotoxicity tests.
Determination of leaching residual MMA concentration
([MMA]r)
[MMA]r in eluates was determined using High Performance Liquid
Chromatography (HPLC) with the HPLC pump (Waters 600 E, Millford, MA, USA)
equipped with a gradient controller (Waters Model 600), autosampler (Waters 717
plus), tunable UV-Vis detector (Waters 486) and a reversed phase C18 with
stainless steel analytical column (µ Bondapak 3.9x300 mm, 10 µ particle size,
125 Aº).The analysis was performed at room temperature (23±2ºC) under the following
conditions: chromatographic grade methanol (Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt,
Germany)/distilled water (1:1) mobile phase; 0.8 mL/min flow rate and detection
at 220 nm.Known serial concentrations of 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 µmol/L (standards) of MMA
dissolved in methanol was analyzed and a calibration curve (Figure 2) was obtained using chromatographic MMA peak at
retention time of 10.22 min (Figure
3).
Figure 2
Standard calibration curve for methyl methacrylate (MMA)
Figure 3
High performance liquid cromatography chromatogram of methyl methacrylate
(MMA) and characteristic peak at approximately 10.22 min of retention
time.
Standard calibration curve for methyl methacrylate (MMA)High performance liquid cromatography chromatogram of methyl methacrylate
(MMA) and characteristic peak at approximately 10.22 min of retention
time.Eluates were diluted with methanol (1:5 v/v) and injected into column with 10 µL
volume. Peak area of each eluate was put into equation obtained from the
calibration curve (Figure 2) and
[MMA]r in each eluate was expressed as µmol/L.Twenty-four chromatographic analyses for each polymerization cycle and 6 for each
elution period with a total of 96 analyses were performed.
Cell culture
L-929 murine fibroblasts (American Type Culture Collection, CCL 1 fibroblast,
NCTC clone 929) were used in the study. Cells were cultured in 75 cm[2] culture flasks (TPP, Tissue
Culture Dish, Switzerland) with the complete cell culture medium described above
and incubated at 37ºC in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95%
air.
Cell proliferation
Cell proliferation was assessed using a colorimetric assay system (XTT Cell
Proliferation Kit; Biological Industries) which measures the reduction of a
tetrazolium component, XTT (sodium
3´-[1-phenyl-aminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]bis(4-methoxy-6-nitro)benzenesulphonic
acid) into soluble formazan product by the mitochondria of viable cells. This
assay kit contains a XTT reagent and an activation solution. 5x10[3] cells were plated in each well
of 96 well-plates and incubated at 37ºC in a humidified atmosphere of 5%
CO2, 95% air for 24 h. 100 µL of eluates were added to each well
and further incubated for 24 h[7,19]. 5 mL of XTT
reagent were mixed with 0.1 mL activation solution in accordance with
manufacturer's instructions to obtain a solution which will react with cells. 50
µL of reaction solution were added to each well and incubated at 37ºC in a
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air for 2 h. Twenty-four cell
proliferation measurements for each polymerization cycle and six for each
elution period with a total of 96 measurements were performed.After incubation, colorimetric absorbance was measured at 450 nm (reference
wavelength at 670 nm) using a microtiter plate reader (Universal Microplate
Reader ELX 800; Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Cell proliferation
was expressed as a percentage of negative controls[7,11,16-19].Data were analyzed statistically using GraphPad Prisma Version 3 (San Diego,
California, USA) [MMA]r and cell proliferation values between the
polymerization cycles were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test and the change in
[MMA]r and cell proliferation values within the cycles were
analyzed with Friedman tests. Post-hoc comparisons were
performed by Dunn's multiple-comparisons test. The correlation between
[MMA]r in eluates and cell proliferation values were analyzed by
Pearson's correlation test at significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS
Leaching [MMA]r
Mean and standard deviation values of [MMA]r of each polymerization
cycle after elution of 1, 2, 5 and 7 days are presented in Table 1. For elution of 1 and 2 days,
leached [MMA]r of long-term terminal boiling cycle (H3) was
significantly (p≤0.001) lower than polymerization cycles with no terminal
boiling (H1) and short-term polymerization with short-term terminal boiling
(H4). For elution of 5 and 7 days, leached [MMA]r of short-term
terminal boiling cycle (H2) was significantly lower than the cycles with no
terminal boiling (H1) (p≤0.05) and long-term terminal boiling cycle (H3)
(p≤0.05), respectively. Leached [MMA]r reduced significantly
(p<0.01) for polymerization cycle with no terminal boiling (H1) between
elution of 1 and 2 days and increased significantly (p<0.05) in long-term
terminal boiling cycle (H3) between elution of 2 and 7 days.
Table 1
Mean residual ± standard deviation methyl methacrylate [MMA]r
values at the end of days 1, 2, 5 and 7 of elution. The same letters
indicate the statistically significant difference between cycles
(p≤0.05)
Cycle
Elution (µmol/L)
Day 1
Day 2
Day 5
Day 7
H1
6.45±2.27a,e
3.23±1.16b
3.41±1.04c
4.04±1.19
H2
2.29±0.89
1.69±0.55
2.02±3.66c
2.38±2.02d
H3
0.92±0.40a
0.71±0.39b,f
2.66±3.62
5.87±2.56d,f
H4
4.39±1.66a
2.12±0.51b
3.54±0.96
4.70±1.13
Mean residual ± standard deviation methyl methacrylate [MMA]r
values at the end of days 1, 2, 5 and 7 of elution. The same letters
indicate the statistically significant difference between cycles
(p≤0.05)Mean and standard deviation of cell proliferation values of each polymerization
cycle after elution of specimens for 1, 2, 5 and 7 days are shown in Table 2. For elution of 1 and 2 days, cell
proliferation values of long-term terminal boiling cycle (H3) were significantly
higher than cycles with no terminal boiling (H1) (p<0.01) and short-term
polymerization with short-term terminal boiling (H4) (p<0.05). Cell
proliferation values changed significantly (p<0.05) only in long-term
terminal boiling cycle (H3) with an increase between elution of 2 and 7
days.
Table 2
Mean cell proliferation (%) at the end of days 1, 2, 5 and 7 of elution.
The same letters indicate the statistically significant difference
between cycles (p≤0.05)
Cycle
Elution
Day 1
Day 2
Day 5
Day 7
H1
67.03±3.18a
74.26±8.7
72.26±6.13
71.88±10.39
H2
73.67±7.99
84.56±5.71
82.88±10.36
72.73±9.96
H3
84.67±9.17a
87.31±15.3b
75.2±10.63
66.84±6.56b
H4
72.99±4.23a
75.04±1.96
70.77±4.04
71.29±2.84
Mean cell proliferation (%) at the end of days 1, 2, 5 and 7 of elution.
The same letters indicate the statistically significant difference
between cycles (p≤0.05)The correlation between leached [MMA]r and cell proliferation values
was negative after elution of 1, 2, 5 and 7 days. The correlation was
statistically significant at elution of 1 day (r=-0.573,
p<0.01) and 2 days (r=-0.491, p≤0.05). The correlation was
also negative with no statistically significance at elution of 5 days
(r=-0.116, p>0.05) and 7 days
(r=-0.339, p>0.05).
DISCUSSION
As far as the existing scientific data on in vitro cytotoxicity of
denture base materials are concerned, there is no available study that identifies or
quantifies the leaching component in eluates of test specimens. This study showed
and quantified that residual MMA leached into eluates. It was observed in this study
that in vitro cytotoxicity changed depending on the leached
[MMA]r. In other words, increased [MMA]r in the eluates
produced reduced cell proliferation, thus increasing in vitro
cytotoxicity. The hypothesis of this study was accepted, since terminal
boiling reduced the leaching of [MMA]r, which in turn decreased the
in vitro cytotoxic effects of heat-polymerized denture base
resin.Salivary concentrations of substances might diffuse from denture base acrylicresin[2,4,20,21,30,32] and show
cytotoxic effects[22], depending on
the time and the refreshing saliva. At the end of each elution period, eluates were
collected and the tubes were re-filled with fresh culture medium[11,22]. This in vitro experimental design was
preferred to simulate the in vivo removal of saliva into
gastrointestinal tract by swallowing and salivary refreshment.It has been shown that leached residual MMA reduced when the polymerization
temperature and time were increased[10,12,32], depending on the decreased residual MMA
content[21,29]. In the present study, the use of terminal boiling
produced marked reductions in [MMA]r of eluates. The results of previous
studies[10,12,14,25,32] that reported the reduction in residual monomer content
with increased terminal boiling time supports the present finding of differences in
[MMA]r between long-term (H3) and short-term (H2 and H4) terminal
boiling cycles. An another interesting finding was that leached [MMA]r of
the short polymerization cycle together with short-term terminal boiling (H4) were
lower than the polymerization cycle with no terminal boiling (H1), observed after 1
and 2 days of elution. Present findings support the results of previous
studies[3,5,12,14,25,32] that indicate the
use of a terminal boiling stage at least for 30 min in the heat-polymerization to
minimize the leaching residual MMA.In the present study, XTT assay was used for the cell proliferation measurements. The
reasons for use of XTT assay are higher sensitivity, production of a water soluble
dye that simplifies the analysis and provides faster determination than other
methods. The use of soluble formazans, such as XTT, has been suggested to eliminate
the error-prone solubilization step which is required for the microculture
tetrazolium assays which employ MTT[6,9,27].According to the ISO[13] (1999)
10993-5 standard, the degree of cytotoxic effect is classified as non-cytotoxic when
cell proliferation is more than 75%, slightly cytotoxic when 50 to 75%, moderately
cytotoxic when 25 to 50% and highly cytotoxic when less than 25%. Use of a terminal
boiling stage has been previously attributed to produce improved cytotoxicity due to
reduced residual monomer levels[15,18]. The finding of negative
correlation between leaching [MMA]r and cell proliferation values
indicates that leaching residual MMA content affects in vitro
cytotoxicity of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. Within the polymerization cycles
tested, the non-cytotoxic effect (the highest cell proliferation values) was
determined in the cycles with short- (H2) and long-term (H3) terminal boiling.
However, this trend was observed at some elution periods and the degree of
cytotoxicity produced by all the polymerization cycles tested was counted as
slightly cytotoxic on L-929 fibroblasts at elution of 7 days. A previous
study[1] has reported higher
cell survival rates of 92%, 82%, 83% 91% and 92% for heat-polymerized specimens
after elution of 1 h, 1, 3, 5 and 7 days, respectively. The differences in
cytotoxicity levels might be due to differences in the experimental designs, such as
elution conditions or cell proliferation assay.In vitro cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins were
previously described mostly after 1 to 2 days of elution[7,8,16-19,22,23]. There are also few studies[1,11,24,28,30] that
investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity of denture base materials
eluted for longer periods than 2 days of elution. In the present study, the shortest
experimental period was 1 day for elution. The main reason for choosing this period
was that the ISO[13] (1999) 10993-5
standard recommends a minimum of 24 h for elution (extraction) process. There is
only one report[1] of elution for 1
h of denture base acrylic resins. However measurement of earlier periods might
provide additional scientific data about leaching mechanism of residual components
and in vitro cytotoxic effects of denture base acrylic resins.It is important to note that the non-significant changes in [MMA]r (except
H3) between elution of 5 and 7 days might be explained by a possible delayed or
resistant leaching behavior of residual MMA from heat-polymerizing denture base
acrylic resin[2]. After elution of 1
and 2 days, leached [MMA]r of this polymerization cycle was also the
lowest. In addition, the decreasing trend in cell proliferation values throughout
days 5 and 7 might be due to the increasing trend in [MMA]r on the same
days. For elution of 5 and 7 days, the lowest cytotoxic effect was observed in
long-term polymerization cycle with short-term terminal boiling (H2). Although no
significant change in [MMA]r and cell proliferation values of this
polymerization cycle was observed between the elution periods, this cycle has
produced the lowest leaching [MMA]r values and cytotoxic effect. The
possibility of presenting [MMA]r values that clinically induce a toxic
effect on oral mucosa or gastrointestinal tract seems to be low.It has previously been stated that water storage of acrylic resin denture bases can
lead to reduction of residual MMA by diffusion into water[5,18,29,31]. Based on the present findings of reduction of leaching
[MMA]r into liquid cell culture media and slightly cytotoxic effects,
water storage of at least 1 to 2 days can be recommended to minimize the risk
potential of toxic or adverse effects of heat-polymerized prosthetic appliances.The results from in vitro cytotoxicity tests cannot be directly
applied to in vivo conditions. However, in vitro
measures play an important role in the analysis of denture base acrylic
resins. Testing of dental materials by cell culture methods is relatively simple to
perform, reproducible, controllable and cost effective[12]. In vitro tests may provide vital
information about the biological behavior of dental materials in a simplified system
that minimizes the effect of confounding variables. The results of cytotoxicity
tests have limitations with regard to their applicability to their clinical use. The
materials used in dentures are subjected to changes in the moist environments of the
oral cavity[18]. Therefore, findings
of in vitro or in vivo tests cannot be
extrapolated to the clinical setting[15].Further studies should focus on the identification of the leaching components or
their derivatives in the moist environment. The correlation between leaching
components and their effects on different cellular mechanisms may be interesting
topics of future investigations.
CONCLUSION
Under the experimental protocol and within the limitations of this in
vitro study, it can be concluded for heat-polymerized denture base
acrylic resin:Residual MMA leached into cell culture media.Polymerization temperature and time can affect the leaching concentrations of
residual MMA.Residual MMA continued to leach throughout 7 days of elution periods and
leaching concentrations markedly reduced after elution of 1 and 2 daysReduction in residual MMA results in reduced in vitro
cytotoxicity.The choice of a polymerization cycle with at least 30 min of terminal boiling
may minimize the leached residual MMA and in vitro
cytotoxicity.
Authors: Ralf Bürgers; Andrea Schubert; Jonas Müller; Sebastian Krohn; Matthias Rödiger; Andreas Leha; Torsten Wassmann Journal: Clin Exp Dent Res Date: 2022-05-15
Authors: Rafaella de S Leão; Sandra L D de Moraes; Kátia A da S Aquino; Cristina P Isolan; Bruno G da S Casado; Marcos A J R Montes Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2018-08-15