OBJECTIVES: To validate a phonocardiogram (PCG)-gated cine imaging approach for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: In this prospective study, cine MR imaging of the LV was performed twice in 79 patients by using retrospectively PCG- and retrospectively ECG-gated cine SSFP sequences at 1.5 T. End-diastolic volumes (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), stroke volumes (SV), ejection fraction (EF), muscle mass (MM), as well as regional wall motion were assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with valvular defects and for patients with dysrhythmia. RESULTS: PCG-gated imaging was feasible in 75 (95%) patients, ECG-gating in all patients. Excellent correlations were observed for all volumetric parameters (r > 0.98 for all variables analysed). No significant differences were observed for EDV (-0.24 ± 3.14 mL, P = 0.5133), ESV (-0.04 ± 2.36 mL, P = 0.8951), SV (-0.20 ± 3.41 mL, P = 0.6083), EF (-0.16 ± 1.98%, P = 0.4910), or MM (0.31 ± 4.2 g, P = 0.7067) for the entire study cohort, nor for either of the subgroups. PCG- and ECG-gated cine imaging revealed similar results for regional wall motion analyses (115 vs. 119 segments with wall motion abnormalities, P = 0.3652). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that PCG-gated cine imaging enables accurate assessment of global and regional LV function in the vast majority of patients in clinical routine. KEY POINTS: Phonocardiogram-gating is an alternative to electrocardiographic-gating in cardiac MR. Phonocardiogram-gated imaging allows reliable assessment of global and regional left-ventricular function. Phonocardiogram-gating is feasible in patients with valvular lesions or cardiac dysrhythmia. Because phonocardiogram-gating is insensitive to magneto-hydrodynamic effects, it is suitable for ultra-high field.
OBJECTIVES: To validate a phonocardiogram (PCG)-gated cine imaging approach for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: In this prospective study, cine MR imaging of the LV was performed twice in 79 patients by using retrospectively PCG- and retrospectively ECG-gated cine SSFP sequences at 1.5 T. End-diastolic volumes (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), stroke volumes (SV), ejection fraction (EF), muscle mass (MM), as well as regional wall motion were assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with valvular defects and for patients with dysrhythmia. RESULTS:PCG-gated imaging was feasible in 75 (95%) patients, ECG-gating in all patients. Excellent correlations were observed for all volumetric parameters (r > 0.98 for all variables analysed). No significant differences were observed for EDV (-0.24 ± 3.14 mL, P = 0.5133), ESV (-0.04 ± 2.36 mL, P = 0.8951), SV (-0.20 ± 3.41 mL, P = 0.6083), EF (-0.16 ± 1.98%, P = 0.4910), or MM (0.31 ± 4.2 g, P = 0.7067) for the entire study cohort, nor for either of the subgroups. PCG- and ECG-gated cine imaging revealed similar results for regional wall motion analyses (115 vs. 119 segments with wall motion abnormalities, P = 0.3652). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that PCG-gated cine imaging enables accurate assessment of global and regional LV function in the vast majority of patients in clinical routine. KEY POINTS: Phonocardiogram-gating is an alternative to electrocardiographic-gating in cardiac MR. Phonocardiogram-gated imaging allows reliable assessment of global and regional left-ventricular function. Phonocardiogram-gating is feasible in patients with valvular lesions or cardiac dysrhythmia. Because phonocardiogram-gating is insensitive to magneto-hydrodynamic effects, it is suitable for ultra-high field.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Harald Kugel; Christoph Bremer; Marco Püschel; Roman Fischbach; Horst Lenzen; Bernd Tombach; Hugo Van Aken; Walter Heindel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-02-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nicholas G Bellenger; Neil J Marcus; Kim Rajappan; Magdi Yacoub; Nicholas R Banner; Dudley J Pennell Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2002 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Kai Nassenstein; Stephan Orzada; Lars Haering; Andreas Czylwik; Christoph Jensen; Thomas Schlosser; Oliver Bruder; Mark E Ladd; Stefan Maderwald Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sören Johst; Stephan Orzada; Anja Fischer; Lena C Schäfer; Kai Nassenstein; Lale Umutlu; Thomas C Lauenstein; Mark E Ladd; Stefan Maderwald Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sören Johst; Stefan Maderwald; Anja Fischer; Harald H Quick; Mark E Ladd; Stephan Orzada Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fabian Kording; Jin Yamamura; Gunnar Lund; Friedrich Ueberle; Caroline Jung; Gerhard Adam; Bjoern Philip Schoennagel Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Juliane Goebel; Felix Nensa; Haemi P Schemuth; Stefan Maderwald; Thomas Schlosser; Stephan Orzada; Stefan Rietsch; Harald H Quick; Kai Nassenstein Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2018-09-11