Literature DB >> 23592011

[Problems and chances of high field magnetic resonance imaging].

M E Ladd1, M Bock.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: The spatial, temporal and spectral resolution in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is in many cases currently not sufficient to detect submillimeter lesions or to image the dynamics of the beating heart. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
METHODS: At present MRI systems at 1.5 T and 3 T are the standard units for clinical imaging. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: The use of ultrahigh magnetic fields of 7 T and higher increases the signal-to-noise ratio, which holds promise for a significant improvement of the spatial and/or temporal resolution as well as for new contrast mechanisms. PERFORMANCE: With 7 T MRI, images of the brain have been acquired routinely with a spatial resolution of 0.3 mm. The theoretical improvement of the signal-to-noise ratio is often not fully realized due to B1 inhomogeneities and contrast variations. ACHIEVEMENTS: With MRI at 7 T a notable increase in spatial resolution can be achieved. Methods such as time-of-flight MR angiography and susceptibility-weighted imaging (e.g. neurofunctional MRI, fMRI) profit especially from the higher field strengths. Transmission field inhomogeneities are still a major challenge for ultrahigh field (UHF) MRI and are also a partially unsolved safety problem. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The use of UHF MRI is currently limited to special applications and the expected gain of the high field must be weighed against technical limitations in both image acquisition and interpretation.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592011     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-012-2344-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  53 in total

Review 1.  Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregor Adriany; Peter Andersen; Wei Chen; Michael Garwood; Rolf Gruetter; Pierre-Gil Henry; Seong-Gi Kim; Haiying Lieu; Ivan Tkac; Tommy Vaughan; Pierre-Francoise Van De Moortele; Essa Yacoub; Xiao-Hong Zhu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Manipulation of image intensity distribution at 7.0 T: passive RF shimming and focusing with dielectric materials.

Authors:  Qing X Yang; Weihua Mao; Jinghua Wang; Michael B Smith; Hao Lei; Xiaoliang Zhang; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Proposed radiofrequency phased-array excitation scheme for homogenous and localized 7-Tesla whole-body imaging based on full-wave numerical simulations.

Authors:  Roney Abraham; Tamer S Ibrahim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  A large-scale study on subjective perception of discomfort during 7 and 1.5 T MRI examinations.

Authors:  Christina Heilmaier; Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Oliver Kraff; Mark E Ladd; Susanne C Ladd
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  Cognition and sensation in very high static magnetic fields: a randomized case-crossover study with different field strengths.

Authors:  Angela Heinrich; Anne Szostek; Patric Meyer; Frauke Nees; Jaane Rauschenberg; Jens Gröbner; Maria Gilles; Georgios Paslakis; Michael Deuschle; Wolfhard Semmler; Herta Flor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations.

Authors:  V R Fuchs; H C Sox
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents at 7 Tesla: in vitro T1 relaxivities in human blood plasma.

Authors:  Iris M Noebauer-Huhmann; Pavol Szomolanyi; Vladimír Juras; Oliver Kraff; Mark E Ladd; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Agents for polarization enhancement in MRI.

Authors:  Silvio Aime; Walter Dastrù; Roberto Gobetto; Daniela Santelia; Alessandra Viale
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2008

9.  Water proton T1 measurements in brain tissue at 7, 3, and 1.5 T using IR-EPI, IR-TSE, and MPRAGE: results and optimization.

Authors:  P J Wright; O E Mougin; J J Totman; A M Peters; M J Brookes; R Coxon; P E Morris; M Clemence; S T Francis; R W Bowtell; P A Gowland
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Cognitive effects of head-movements in stray fields generated by a 7 Tesla whole-body MRI magnet.

Authors:  F de Vocht; T Stevens; P Glover; A Sunderland; P Gowland; H Kromhout
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.010

View more
  3 in total

1.  Experience with magnetic resonance imaging of human subjects with passive implants and tattoos at 7 T: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yacine Noureddine; Andreas K Bitz; Mark E Ladd; Markus Thürling; Susanne C Ladd; Gregor Schaefers; Oliver Kraff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Intervertebral disc lesions: visualisation with ultra-high field MRI at 11.7 T.

Authors:  Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Fabio Galbusera; Volker Rasche; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Feasibility of aortic valve planimetry at 7 T ultrahigh field MRI: Comparison to aortic valve MRI at 3 T and 1.5 T.

Authors:  Juliane Goebel; Felix Nensa; Haemi P Schemuth; Stefan Maderwald; Thomas Schlosser; Stephan Orzada; Stefan Rietsch; Harald H Quick; Kai Nassenstein
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-09-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.