Literature DB >> 21945858

Experimental small field 6 MV output ratio analysis for various diode detector and accelerator combinations.

Gavin Cranmer-Sargison1, Steve Weston, Narinder P Sidhu, David I Thwaites.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to measure 6MV small field, detector specific, output ratios (OR(det)) using the IBA stereotactic field diode (SFD) and the PTW T60008, T60012, T60016 and T60017 field diodes on both Varian iX and Elekta Synergy accelerators, to establish estimates for the experimental uncertainty and characterize the measurement precision under various conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were acquired at depths of 1.5, 5.0 and 10.0 cm for square field sizes of 3.0, 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6 and 0.5 cm. Three isocentric measurements comprised of five readings were made to calculate an experimental output ratio OR(det) with respect to a field size of 5.0 cm. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to characterize the precision associated with each detector-linac combination. Another measurement set was made to investigate the influence of jaw position accuracy.
RESULTS: As expected for field sizes smaller than 3.0 cm, the measured OR(det) were not consistent across all detectors. The standard percent uncertainty in measured OR(det) was found to be nearly consistent across all detector-linac combinations: less than ±0.25% for the 3.0 cm field size, increasing to approximately ±1.25% for the smallest field sizes. As the field size was reduced to 0.5 cm the CV increased to 0.10% and 0.15% on the Varian and Elekta linacs, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Experimental small field OR(det) measured with the diode detectors used in this study are reproducible to within ±1.25% (standard uncertainty), with the precision of any one set of measurements can be characterized with a CV between 0.10% and 0.15%.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21945858     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  8 in total

1.  Dosimetric characterization and behaviour in small X-ray fields of a microchamber and a plastic scintillator detector.

Authors:  Massimo Pasquino; Claudia Cutaia; Lorenzo Radici; Serena Valzano; Eva Gino; Carlo Cavedon; Michele Stasi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Variation of kQclin,Qmsr (fclin,fmsr) for the small-field dosimetric parameters percentage depth dose, tissue-maximum ratio, and off-axis ratio.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Sam Beddar; Ninfa Satariano; Indra J Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Effectiveness of the Monte Carlo method in stereotactic radiation therapy applied to quasi-homogenous brain tumors.

Authors:  Ki Mun Kang; Bae Kwon Jeong; Hoon Sik Choi; Jin Ho Song; Byung-Do Park; Young Kyung Lim; Hojin Jeong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15

4.  Survey of 5 mm small-field output factor measurements in Australia.

Authors:  Christopher P Oliver; Duncan J Butler; Viliami Takau; Ivan Williams
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  Božidar Casar; Eduard Gershkevitsh; Ignasi Mendez; Slaven Jurković; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The impact of corrected field output factors based on IAEA/AAPM code of practice on small-field dosimetry to the calculated monitor unit in eclipse™ treatment planning system.

Authors:  Sammuel Mamesa; Sornjarod Oonsiri; Taweap Sanghangthum; Sumalee Yabsantia; Sivalee Suriyapee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  An analytical formalism for the assessment of dose uncertainties due to positioning uncertainties.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lechner; Dietmar Georg; Hugo Palmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A novel and effective method for validation and measurement of output factors for Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ using TRS 483 protocol.

Authors:  Swapna Lilly Cyriac; Jian Liu; Emel Calugaru; Jenghwa Chang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.