Literature DB >> 21939965

Perceptual learning evidence for contextually-specific representations.

Tanya Kraljic1, Arthur G Samuel.   

Abstract

Listeners rapidly adjust to talkers' pronunciations, accommodating those pronunciations into the relevant phonemic category to improve subsequent perception. Previous work has suggested that such learning is restricted to pronunciations that are representative of how the speaker talks (Kraljic, Samuel, & Brennan, 2008). If an ambiguous pronunciation, for example, can be attributed to an external source (such as a pen in the speaker's mouth), or if it is preceded by normal pronunciations of the same sound, learning is blocked. In three experiments, we explore this blocking effect in more detail. Our aim is to better understand the nature of the representations underlying the perceptual learning process. Experiment 1 replicates the blocking effect. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrate that it can be eliminated when certain visual information occurs simultaneously with the auditory signal. The pattern of learning and non-learning is best accounted for by the view that speech perception is mediated by episodic representations that include potentially relevant visual information.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939965      PMCID: PMC3214006          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  12 in total

1.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-29

3.  Perceptual learning in speech.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.

Authors:  Meghan Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-25

5.  First impressions and last resorts: how listeners adjust to speaker variability.

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Arthur G Samuel; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

6.  The weckud wetch of the wast: lexical adaptation to a novel accent.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-05

7.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.

Authors:  S D Goldinger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Changing Structures in Midstream: Learning Along the Statistical Garden Path.

Authors:  Andrea L Gebhart; Richard N Aslin; Elissa L Newport
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-08

9.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Talker adaptation in speech perception: adjusting the signal or the representations?

Authors:  Delphine Dahan; Sarah J Drucker; Rebecca A Scarborough
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-07-23
View more
  14 in total

1.  Changes in task-extrinsic context do not affect the persistence of long-term cumulative structural priming.

Authors:  Timothy J Kutta; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-25

2.  Lexical Information Guides Retuning of Neural Patterns in Perceptual Learning for Speech.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; João M Correia; Dave F Kleinschmidt; Laura Mesite; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Lori L Holt; Patryk Laurent; Sung-Joo Lim; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Perceptual learning of speech under optimal and adverse conditions.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Talker-specific pronunciation or speech error? Discounting (or not) atypical pronunciations during speech perception.

Authors:  Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; James S Magnuson; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Constraints on the transfer of perceptual learning in accented speech.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Alissa Melinger; Andrea Weber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.