Literature DB >> 18399885

First impressions and last resorts: how listeners adjust to speaker variability.

Tanya Kraljic1, Arthur G Samuel, Susan E Brennan.   

Abstract

Perceptual theories must explain how perceivers extract meaningful information from a continuously variable physical signal. In the case of speech, the puzzle is that little reliable acoustic invariance seems to exist. We tested the hypothesis that speech-perception processes recover invariants not about the signal, but rather about the source that produced the signal. Findings from two manipulations suggest that the system learns those properties of speech that result from idiosyncratic characteristics of the speaker; the same properties are not learned when they can be attributed to incidental factors. We also found evidence for how the system determines what is characteristic: In the absence of other information about the speaker, the system relies on episodic order, representing those properties present during early experience as characteristic of the speaker. This "first-impressions" bias can be overridden, however, when variation is an incidental consequence of a temporary state (a pen in the speaker's mouth), rather than characteristic of the speaker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18399885     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02090.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  45 in total

1.  Perceptual learning evidence for contextually-specific representations.

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-09-21

2.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Jessica E D Alexander; Sabrina K Sidaras; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Incremental implicit learning of bundles of statistical patterns.

Authors:  Ting Qian; T Florian Jaeger; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-15

4.  Accommodating variation: dialects, idiolects, and speech processing.

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Susan E Brennan; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-09-04

5.  Situational influences on rhythmicity in speech, music, and their interaction.

Authors:  Sarah Hawkins
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Generalization to unfamiliar talkers in artificial language learning.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

9.  Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; David R Wozny; Holger Mitterer; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-07-01

10.  Foreign subtitles help but native-language subtitles harm foreign speech perception.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; James M McQueen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.