Literature DB >> 21938560

Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison.

Warren Hwalung Tseng1, Robert J Canter, Richard J Bold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) outcomes have largely relied on single-institution data from high-volume, tertiary centers. To provide contemporary, national benchmarks of ODP outcomes, we examined the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.
METHODS: Using the ACS-NSQIP database (2005-2007), we identified 868 cases of ODP. Operative time, intraoperative transfusion, and length-of-stay (LOS) data were compiled. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed adjusting for age, body mass index, diagnosis, creatinine, albumin, hematocrit, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification for likelihood of any postoperative complication and severe complication (composite endpoint: organ space surgical site infection, reoperation, or death).
RESULTS: Thirty-day overall complication, severe complication, and mortality rates were 27.2%, 11.6%, and 1%, respectively. Mean operative time was 206 min (±86), 18.1% patients required intraoperative red blood cell transfusion (median 2 units), and median LOS was 6 days. Predictors of any complication or severe complication were renal insufficiency, hypoalbuminemia, and worsening ASA classification. Malignant diagnosis was not associated with poorer outcomes. DISCUSSION: ODP remains the gold standard for lesions of the pancreatic body or tail. The current analysis reflects nationwide data that may serve as current benchmarks for both open and laparoscopic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21938560     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1677-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  B W Eom; J-Y Jang; S E Lee; H-S Han; Y-S Yoon; S-W Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.

Authors:  David A Kooby; Theresa Gillespie; David Bentrem; Attila Nakeeb; Max C Schmidt; Nipun B Merchant; Alex A Parikh; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Syed Ahmad; Hong Jin Kim; Jaemin Park; Fabian Johnston; Matthew J Strouch; Alex Menze; Jennifer Rymer; Rebecca McClaine; Steven M Strasberg; Mark S Talamonti; Charles A Staley; Kelly M McMasters; Andrew M Lowy; Johnita Byrd-Sellers; William C Wood; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Distal pancreatectomy: what is the standard for laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  Benjamin M Stutchfield; Saju Joseph; Andrew D Duckworth; O James Garden; Rowan W Parks
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Marshall S Baker; David J Bentrem; Michael B Ujiki; Susan Stocker; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Clinical outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakamura; Eiji Uchida; Takayuki Aimoto; Satoshi Matsumoto; Hiroshi Yoshida; Takashi Tajiri
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-12-16

7.  Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective.

Authors:  James T McPhee; Joshua S Hill; Giles F Whalen; Maksim Zayaruzny; Demetrius E Litwin; Mary E Sullivan; Frederick A Anderson; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy.

Authors:  M C Aldridge; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jörg Kleeff; Markus K Diener; Kaspar Z'graggen; Ulf Hinz; Markus Wagner; Jeannine Bachmann; Jörg Zehetner; Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: a comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  Kelly R Finan; Emily E Cannon; Eugenia J Kim; Mary M Wesley; Pablo J Arnoletti; Martin J Heslin; John D Christein
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  10 in total

1.  Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center.

Authors:  Luciano De Carlis; Fabio Ferla; Stefano Di Sandro; Alessandro Giacomoni; Riccardo De Carlis; Raffaella Sguinzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-04-22

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection-a review.

Authors:  Viktor Justin; Abe Fingerhut; Igor Khatkov; Selman Uranues
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-04

3.  Analysis of risk factors for hemorrhage and related outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy in an intermediate-volume center.

Authors:  Fabio Uggeri; Luca Nespoli; Marta Sandini; Anita Andreano; Luca Degrate; Fabrizio Romano; Laura Antolini; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Kiran Altaf; Jun J Xiong; Wei Huang; Muhammad A Javed; Gang Mai; Xu B Liu; Wei M Hu; Qing Xia
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Deniece Riviere; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David A Kooby; Charles M Vollmer; Marc G H Besselink; Brian R Davidson; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-04

Review 6.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: better than open?

Authors:  Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranues; Igor Khatkov; Luigi Boni
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-01

7.  Management of late hemorrhage after pancreatic surgery: treatment strategy and prognosis.

Authors:  Xin Wu; Ge Chen; Wenming Wu; Taiping Zhang; Quan Liao; Menghua Dai; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Emergent pancreatectomy for neoplastic disease: outcomes analysis of 534 ACS-NSQIP patients.

Authors:  Michael R Driedger; Carlos A Puig; Cornelius A Thiels; John R Bergquist; Daniel S Ubl; Elizabeth B Habermann; Travis E Grotz; Rory L Smoot; David M Nagorney; Sean P Cleary; Michael L Kendrick; Mark J Truty
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Male gender and increased body mass index independently predicts clinically relevant morbidity after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Traian Dumitrascu; Mihai Eftimie; Andra Aiordachioae; Cezar Stroescu; Simona Dima; Mihnea Ionescu; Irinel Popescu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  Distal pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: is laparoscopic really better than open?

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Ali Tavakkoli; Thomas E Clancy; Stanley W Ashley
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.