Literature DB >> 19590649

Distal pancreatectomy: what is the standard for laparoscopic surgery?

Benjamin M Stutchfield1, Saju Joseph, Andrew D Duckworth, O James Garden, Rowan W Parks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is performed for a range of benign and malignant lesions. Accurate pre-operative diagnosis can be unreliable and morbidity remains high. This study evaluates a 12-year, single-centre experience with open DP to review indications, diagnoses and associated morbidity.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent DP at a UK-based tertiary referral centre between 1994 and 2006.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (mean age 49.9 years) had final diagnoses of chronic pancreatitis +/- pseudocyst (n= 22), benign cystadenoma (n= 15), neuroendocrine tumour (n= 8), primary pancreatic carcinoma (n= 6) and 14 other conditions. DP performed for presumed cystic neoplasm (n= 24) revealed a correct pre-operative diagnosis in 71% of patients. Histological examination confirmed that 59% of resected cystic tumours were either malignant or had malignant potential. When DP was undertaken for presumed pseudocyst (n= 12), 83% of cases were correctly diagnosed pre-operatively. Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 3% and 39%, respectively, with five patients (8%) developing a clinically significant pancreatic fistula. Ten (17%) patients developed diabetes mellitus and nine (14%) required long-term pancreatic exocrine supplementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Open DP can be performed with acceptable morbidity, low mortality and preservation of pancreatic function in the majority of cases, setting the standard for laparoscopic techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distal pancreatectomy; laparoscopic; postoperative pancreatic fistula

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590649      PMCID: PMC2697890          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00008.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  24 in total

Review 1.  Port site metastases.

Authors:  Myriam J Curet
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: the Brisbane experience of forty-six cases.

Authors:  C Taylor; N O'Rourke; L Nathanson; I Martin; G Hopkins; L Layani; M Ghusn; G Fielding
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Long-term results of distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis in 90 patients.

Authors:  Robert R Hutchins; Richard S Hart; Marc Pacifico; Nicholas J Bradley; Robin C N Williamson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Javier Targarona; Sarah P Thayer; David W Rattner; William R Brugge; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-04

5.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula development after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Nobutsugu Abe; Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Suzuki; Yasuharu Yamaguchi; Osamu Yanagida; Tadahiko Masaki; Toshiyuki Mori; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: cost-benefit analysis and proposed management algorithm.

Authors:  Sherry J Lim; Rameez Alasadi; Jeffrey D Wayne; Sam Rao; Alfred Rademaker; Richard Bell; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Melotti; Giovanni Butturini; Micaela Piccoli; Luca Casetti; Claudio Bassi; Barbara Mullineris; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Is laparoscopic resection adequate in patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors?

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Laia Blanco; Rebeca Cosa; Héctor Rendón
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  4 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison.

Authors:  Warren Hwalung Tseng; Robert J Canter; Richard J Bold
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospects.

Authors:  Omer S Al-Taan; James A Stephenson; Christopher Briggs; Cristina Pollard; Matthew S Metcalfe; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Kiran Altaf; Jun J Xiong; Wei Huang; Muhammad A Javed; Gang Mai; Xu B Liu; Wei M Hu; Qing Xia
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Xue-Min Chen; Dong-Lin Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.