Literature DB >> 28138603

Laparoscopic pancreatic resection-a review.

Viktor Justin1, Abe Fingerhut2, Igor Khatkov3, Selman Uranues2.   

Abstract

Contrary to many other gastrointestinal operations, minimal access approaches in pancreatic surgery have gained ground slowly. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy has gained wide acceptance. It is associated with reduced blood loss and shorter duration of stay (DOS) while oncologic results and morbidity are similar to open surgery. In recent years the number of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies has also increased. While oncological outcome seems comparable to the open approach, operative times are longer while DOS and blood loss are reduced. One added advantage of the laparoscopic approach to pancreatic cancer seems to be that adjuvant treatment can start earlier. Minimal access total pancreatectomy, only reported in small numbers (mostly robot assisted), has also been shown to be feasible and safe. Enucleation (EN) of small pancreatic lesions is the most common tissue sparing resection. Although no reconstruction is necessary, the risk of pancreatic fistula is high, related to excision margins equal or smaller than 2 mm to the main pancreatic duct. Compared to the open approach, laparoscopic EN has shown comparable results in terms of morbidity, pancreatic function and fistula rate, with shorter operation times and faster recovery. Experience in robot assisted pancreatic surgery is increasing. However reports are still small in numbers, lacking randomization and mostly limited to dedicated centers. The learning curve for minimal access pancreatic surgery is steep. Low patient volume leads to longer DOS, higher costs and negatively impacts outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimal access surgery (MAS); laparoscopy; pancreas; pancreatic resection

Year:  2016        PMID: 28138603      PMCID: PMC5244659          DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2016.04.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  78 in total

1.  Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Simona Palladino; Gabriele Massimetti; Fabio Vistoli; Fabio Caniglia; Nelide De Lio; Vittorio Perrone; Linda Barbarello; Mario Belluomini; Stefano Signori; Gabriella Amorese; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Authors:  Ser Yee Lee; Peter J Allen; Eran Sadot; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented?

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Jason A Breaux; Jennifer L Steel; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Outcome after laparoscopic enucleation for non-functional neuroendocrine pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Víctor Molina; Rodrigo Vallejos; Enrique Jiménez Chavarria; Miguel-Angel López-Boado; Joana Ferrer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Enucleation of pancreatic lesions: indications, outcomes, and risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Taiping Zhang; Jianwei Xu; Tianxiao Wang; Quan Liao; Menghua Dai; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: better than open?

Authors:  Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranues; Igor Khatkov; Luigi Boni
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  Laparoscopic Frey's Procedure for Chronic Pancreatitis in a Japanese Patient.

Authors:  Takayoshi Nakajima; Takeshi Fukumoto; Tadashi Tsukamoto; Akishige Kanazawa; Shintaro Kodai; Yoshihiro Mori
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.