Literature DB >> 15308435

The relation of autopsy rate to physicians' beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy.

Elizabeth C Burton1, Russell S Phillips, Kenneth E Covinsky, Laura P Sands, Lee Goldman, Neal V Dawson, Alfred F Connors, C Seth Landefeld.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multiple factors have affected the decline in autopsy rates. Our goal was to determine the relation of physicians' recommendations regarding autopsy, as well as patient and surrogate decision-maker characteristics, to autopsy performance.
METHODS: We assessed measures related to autopsy performance using data from two teaching institutions in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. We included patients who had died within 6 months of their index hospitalization and for whom information was available on autopsy performance, physicians' response to questions about autopsy, and interviews with surrogate decision makers about autopsy performance. We assessed the association between autopsy performance and the strength of a physician's recommendation for autopsy, adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 680 patients who died, 59% (n = 402) met our inclusion criteria. Based on physician and surrogate responses, the expected autopsy rate was 42% while the actual autopsy rate was 23%. The autopsy rate was higher when the physician's recommendation for autopsy was strong or very strong at the time of death compared with when autopsy was not recommended strongly or not at all (P <0.001). The strength of the physician's postmortem recommendation was independently associated with autopsy performance after adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics (P <0.001).
CONCLUSION: Autopsies are less likely to be performed when not recommended strongly or not at all. Training physicians (or others) how to recommend autopsies may increase autopsy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15308435     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  17 in total

1.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  The clinical, research, and social value of autopsy after any cancer death: a perspective from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee.

Authors:  Sheri L Spunt; Sara O Vargas; Cheryl M Coffin; Stephen X Skapek; David M Parham; Joan Darling; Douglas S Hawkins; Charles Keller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Reversing the slow death of the clinical necropsy: developing the post of the Pathology Liaison Nurse.

Authors:  Eileen Limacher; Urszula Carr; Lesley Bowker; Richard Y Ball
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The case for postmortem imaging.

Authors:  H Theodore Harcke
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16

5.  Virtopsy versus digital autopsy: virtual autopsy.

Authors:  C Pomara; V Fineschi; G Scalzo; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  [Public perceptions of hospital autopsies: results of a representative survey].

Authors:  A Kahl
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  The value of postmortem microbiology cultures.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in children: technique and clinical applications.

Authors:  Eric P Eutsler; Geetika Khanna
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26

Review 9.  NOTES--third generation surgery. Vain hopes or the reality of tomorrow?

Authors:  Jarek Kobiela; Tomasz Stefaniak; Malgorzata Mackowiak; Andrzej J Lachinski; Zbigniew Sledzinski
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) as a diagnostic tool in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Raymond P Onders; Michael F McGee; Jeffrey Marks; Amitabh Chak; Michael J Rosen; Anthony Ignagni; Ashley Faulx; Steve Schomisch; Jeffrey Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.