Literature DB >> 8718899

Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families. What needs to be done.

S J McPhee1.   

Abstract

The benefits of autopsy, both for clinicians and families, are reviewed. The autopsy rate in the United States has fallen dramatically in the past 50 years. The many factors contributing to this decline are summarized. For clinicians and families to receive the maximum benefits from the autopsy will require (1) altering methods of obtaining consent (eg, using trained autopsy advocates and enhancing awareness of cultural issues); (2) altering autopsy procedures (eg, decreasing turnaround time; discussing issues and concerns with clinicians; and issuing more detailed, less technical reports); (3) improving communication with clinicians and families (eg, collecting clinician and family contact information on autopsy permits; inviting attendings, housestaff, and students to attend gross conferences; making telephone calls regarding unexpected findings; guaranteeing reports to clinicians; writing nontechnical summary letters to clinicians and families when the final report is completed; and conducting postautopsy conferences); and (4) educating both medical professionals and public citizens about the value of autopsy (eg, featuring autopsy results in medical conferences, distributing educational materials, and using print and electronic media).

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8718899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  16 in total

1.  Information before coronial necropsy: how much should be available?

Authors:  H Sampson; A Johnson; N Carter; G Rutty
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Should the autopsy be resuscitated?

Authors:  F Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.

Authors:  C Snowdon; D R Elbourne; J Garcia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Necropsy practice after the "organ retention scandal": requests, performance, and tissue retention.

Authors:  J L Burton; J C E Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Early experience with digital advance care planning and directives, a novel consumer-driven program.

Authors:  Robert L Fine; Zhiyong Yang; Christy Spivey; Bonnie Boardman; Maureen Courtney
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-07

8.  Invasive fungal disease in university hospital: a PCR-based study of autopsy cases.

Authors:  Komkrit Ruangritchankul; Ariya Chindamporn; Navaporn Worasilchai; Ubon Poumsuk; Somboon Keelawat; Andrey Bychkov
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

9.  Determinants for autopsy after unexplained deaths possibly resulting from infectious causes, United States.

Authors:  Lindy Liu; Laura L Sinden; Robert C Holman; Dianna M Blau
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 10.  Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications.

Authors:  Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.