Literature DB >> 28698908

[Adult autopsies during the past decade in Germany : Data from two university hospitals].

F Erlmeier1, W Weichert2,3, R Knüchel4, J Andruszkow4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical autopsy is the ultimate medical service for a patient and plays a crucial role in the education of physicians and other medical personnel, as well as in the context of quality control. Nevertheless, the number of autopsies is constantly decreasing. Numerous factors, such as the personal attitude of relatives and also clarification of relatives, as well as the increasing application of imaging methods while the patient is still alive, play a central role in this decline.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate the development of autopsy services over the past decade in two university hospitals in Germany and therefore to underline the importance of this investigation procedure in pathology.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Autopsy reports between the years 2005 and 2014 from 2 university institutes of pathology were analyzed regarding a diverse dataset, including age and sex of the deceased as well as the clinical and pathological causes of death.
RESULTS: The data showed that the number of autopsies has continuously decreased over the past decade; however, the distribution of characteristics of the deceased remained relatively stable. In this cohort the clinically assumed cause of death differed from the pathological cause of death in 6% of the autopsies. Frequently occurring discrepant diagnoses were cardiac tamponade, aortic dissection and endocarditis/myocarditis. DISCUSSION: Our results show that, despite significant improvements in imaging methods, findings do not yield more accurate results than does autopsy. This underscores once again the need to encourage the performance of this final medical act on patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autopsy; Decreasing autopsy frequency; Development; Imaging method; Quality control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28698908     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-017-0319-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  24 in total

1.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Elizabeth C Burton; Kathryn M McDonald; Lee Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  [Quality control by autopsy. How often do the postmortem examination findings correct the clinical diagnosis?].

Authors:  T M Bauer; D Potratz; T Göller; A Wagner; R Schäfer
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1991-05-24       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  [Necessity of increasing autopsy frequency following the introduction of DRGs].

Authors:  M G Krukemeyer; C v d Driesch; A Dankof; V Krenn; D Hansen; M Dietel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  ["Hic gaudet mors succurere vitae", autopsy findings of the Mainz Institute of Pathology 1971-2010. An analysis on the occasion of the 100 year jubilee].

Authors:  T Hansen; S Höring; F Rosendahl; M Dusolt; C Kempe; M Hechtner; C Sommer; C J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  [The number of autopsies at the Chemnitz Institute of Pathology before and after unification (1987-1992)].

Authors:  J O Habeck; H Waller
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Misdiagnosis at a university hospital in 4 medical eras.

Authors:  W Kirch; C Schafii
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  The impact of declining clinical autopsy: need for revised healthcare policy.

Authors:  Jianguo Xiao; Gerhard R F Krueger; L Maximilian Buja; Michael Covinsky
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.378

9.  Temporal Trends in Mortality in the United States, 1969-2013.

Authors:  Jiemin Ma; Elizabeth M Ward; Rebecca L Siegel; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Clinical diagnosis and the function of necropsy.

Authors:  F Berger
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Post-Mortem Examination as a Quality Improvement Instrument.

Authors:  Christian Wittekind; Tanja Gradistanac
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Cause of Death in Patients in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Justus Domschikowski; Karoline Koch; Claudia Schmalz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.