Literature DB >> 21937905

Influence of self-reported limb length discrepancy on function and satisfaction 6 years after total hip replacement.

Maura D Iversen1, Nidhi Chudasama, Elena Losina, Jeffrey N Katz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Limb length discrepancy (LLD), a complication of total hip replacement (THR), can lead to limp, nerve injuries, functional limitations, and dissatisfaction. To assess the influence of perceived LLD on function and satisfaction 6 years after primary THR.
METHODS: Survey data from 638 Medicare participants aged 65 years and older who underwent elective primary unilateral THR. Questionnaires included demographics, comorbidity, pain, function, satisfaction, and perceived LLD. Primary outcomes were function and satisfaction at 6 years. Wilcoxon tests determined associations between perceived LLD and function and satisfaction. Logistic regression identified the independent effect of LLD on worse functional status and dissatisfaction with surgery.
RESULTS: Adjusting for demographic factors, education, and comorbidities, patients reporting perceived LLD were twice as likely to report poor functional status (odds ratio [OR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.36). Multivariate analysis-revealed perceived LLD was a significant correlate of dissatisfaction with surgery (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.40-3.70). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Perceived LLD is a significant correlate of poor physical function and dissatisfaction 6 years after THR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21937905      PMCID: PMC3179609          DOI: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e31820e16dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther        ISSN: 1539-8412            Impact factor:   3.381


  21 in total

1.  Disability in adults with hip and knee arthroplasty: a French national community based survey.

Authors:  I Boutron; S Poiraudeau; J-F Ravaud; G Baron; M Revel; R Nizard; M Dougados; Ph Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Arthroplasty of the hip. Leg length is not important.

Authors:  T O White; T W Dougall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

3.  The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment.

Authors:  N N Mahomed; D C Arndt; B J McGrory; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99.

Authors:  O Furnes; S A Lie; B Espehaug; S E Vollset; L B Engesaeter; L I Havelin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-05

5.  Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.

Authors:  J N Katz; E Losina; J Barrett; C B Phillips; N N Mahomed; R A Lew; E Guadagnoli; W H Harris; R Poss; J A Baron
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; I F Petersson; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Charlotte B Phillips; John A Baron; Anne H Fossel; Nizar N Mahomed; Jane Barrett; Elizabeth A Lingard; William H Harris; Robert Poss; Robert A Lew; Edward Guadagnoli; Elizabeth A Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-02

9.  Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Je-Ken Chang; Chi-Yin Wong; Jun-Wen Wang; Yuan-Kun Tu; Herng-Chia Chiu; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nizar N Mahomed; Matthew H Liang; Earl F Cook; Lawren H Daltroy; Paul R Fortin; Anne H Fossel; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  11 in total

1.  A new and simple intraoperative method for correction of leg-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tagomori; Nobuhiro Kaku; Tomonori Tabata; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-01

2.  A new concept for measuring leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Sam Khamis; Eli Carmeli
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-27

3.  The Effectiveness of Specific Exercise Approach or Modifiable Heel Lift in the Treatment of Functional Leg Length Discrepancy in Early Post-surgery Inpatients after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a PROBE design.

Authors:  Tatsuya Nakanowatari; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2016-11-29

4.  Computer navigation and distal femoral reconstruction in the oncologic patient.

Authors:  Brian T Palumbo; Eric Henderson; Justin Rizer; Douglas G Letson; David Cheong
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-23

5.  Pre- and postoperative offset and femoral neck version measurements and validation using 3D computed tomography in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mats Geijer; Sverrir Kiernan; Martin Sundberg; Gunnar Flivik
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2020-10-08

6.  Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction.

Authors:  Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Michael Rühle; Fabian Springer; Heiko Baumgartner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Effect of symmetrical restoration for the migration of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized RSA study with 75 patients and 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sverrir Kiernan; Mats Geijer; Martin Sundberg; Gunnar Flivik
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Measuring Dynamic Leg Length during Normal Gait.

Authors:  Sam Khamis; Shmuel Springer; Dror Ovadia; Sima Krimus; Eli Carmeli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Overview and Spinal Implications of Leg Length Discrepancy: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ariella Applebaum; Adam Nessim; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  Is There a Reliable Method to Predict the Limb Length Discrepancy after Chemotherapy and Limb Salvage Surgery in Children with Osteosarcoma?

Authors:  Yuan Li; Feng Liao; Hai-Rong Xu; Xiao-Hui Niu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.