Literature DB >> 12972468

Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

A-K Nilsdotter1, I F Petersson, E M Roos, L S Lohmander.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate prospectively long term patient relevant outcomes after unilateral total hip replacement (THR) for osteoarthritis (OA). To identify non-responders to this intervention and patient related predictors of unsatisfactory outcome.
METHODS: A case-control study comparing health related quality of life of 219 patients (mean age 71) after THR with that of a matched reference group of 117 subjects without hip complaints recruited from the community. Patients and reference group answered SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires preoperatively, at 3, 6, 12 months, and at 3.6 years (range 26-65 months) postoperatively. Supplementary questions were asked at the final follow up.
RESULTS: 198/211 (94%) of the patients and 83/109 (76%) of the reference group participated at the final follow up. At follow up, the only difference between the two groups in the SF-36 was physical function, where patients scored worse. Patients also reported worse WOMAC function. 31% of the patients had improved by <10/100 WOMAC score points for pain and/or function at final follow up, compared with preoperatively. More pain preoperatively and higher age and postoperative low back pain predicted a worse outcome in WOMAC function.
CONCLUSION: 3.6 years after THR for OA, health related quality of life was similar for patients and reference group except for function, where patients had worse function. Higher age and more pain preoperatively predicted a poor outcome. Patients with hip OA with musculoskeletal comorbidities, such as low back pain and OA of the non-operated hip, have less long term functional improvement after THR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12972468      PMCID: PMC1754324          DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.10.923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  42 in total

1.  Specificity of the Oxford knee status questionnaire. The effect of disease of the hip or lumbar spine on patients' perception of knee disability.

Authors:  W G Harcourt; S H White; P Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

2.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-04

3.  Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement.

Authors:  A K Nilsdotter; E M Roos; J P Westerlund; H P Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-06

4.  Chronic musculoskeletal pain, prevalence rates, and sociodemographic associations in a Swedish population study.

Authors:  S Bergman; P Herrström; K Högström; I F Petersson; B Svensson; L T Jacobsson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery.

Authors:  P R Fortin; A E Clarke; L Joseph; M H Liang; M Tanzer; D Ferland; C Phillips; A J Partridge; P Bélisle; A H Fossel; N Mahomed; C B Sledge; J N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-08

7.  Comorbidity in arthritis.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; C S Crowson; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities.

Authors:  F Angst; A Aeschlimann; G Stucki
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-08

9.  Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention.

Authors:  F Angst; A Aeschlimann; W Steiner; G Stucki
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; J C Albright; D D Goetz; J P Olejniczak; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  75 in total

1.  Do hip OA patients referred to orthopedic surgeons by general practitioners and rheumatologists differ?

Authors:  Maxime Samson; Jean-Francis Maillefert; Carine Roy; Christian Cadet; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Influence of self-reported limb length discrepancy on function and satisfaction 6 years after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Maura D Iversen; Nidhi Chudasama; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

Review 3.  EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  W Zhang; M Doherty; N Arden; B Bannwarth; J Bijlsma; K-P Gunther; H J Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; K Jordan; P Kaklamanis; B Leeb; M Lequesne; S Lohmander; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; B Swoboda; R Varatojo; G Verbruggen; I Zimmermann-Gorska; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after hip replacement.

Authors:  Fraser Birrell; Stefan Lohmander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-09

Review 5.  Surgical management of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The role of pain and functional impairment in the decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1909 patients. Report of the OARSI-OMERACT Task Force on total joint replacement.

Authors:  L Gossec; S Paternotte; J F Maillefert; C Combescure; P G Conaghan; A M Davis; K-P Gunther; G Hawker; M Hochberg; J N Katz; M Kloppenburg; K Lim; L S Lohmander; N N Mahomed; L March; K Pavelka; L Punzi; E M Roos; L Sanchez-Riera; J A Singh; M E Suarez-Almazor; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Influence of the contralateral hip state after total hip arthroplasty on patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Mikio Matsumoto; Tomonori Baba; Hironori Ochi; Yu Ozaki; Taiji Watari; Yasuhiro Homma; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-25

8.  Oxford hip scores at 6 months and 5 years are associated with total hip revision within the subsequent 2 years.

Authors:  Peter Devane; Geoffrey Horne; Daniel J Gehling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Improvement following total knee replacement surgery: Exploring preoperative symptoms and change in preoperative symptoms.

Authors:  Ernest R Vina; Michael J Hannon; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Patient relevant outcome 7 years after total hip replacement for OA - a prospective study.

Authors:  Anna-K Nilsdotter; Fredrik Isaksson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.