Literature DB >> 21929566

High resolution manometry patterns distinguish acid sensitivity in non-cardiac chest pain.

V M Kushnir1, C Prakash Gyawali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High resolution manometry (HRM) has demonstrated two distinct smooth muscle contraction segments in the esophageal body; changes in these segments typify certain esophageal disorders. We investigated segmental characteristics in subgroups of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP).
METHODS: 32 NCCP subjects were segregated into a GERD group (ambulatory pH testing off antisecretory therapy showing elevated total acid exposure time, AET≥4.0% and positive symptom association probability, SAP) and an acid sensitive group (normal AET and positive SAP). HRM Clouse plots were analyzed; smooth muscle segment lengths, pressure amplitude peaks were measured for segment 2 and segment 3 (proximal and distal smooth muscle segments). Pressure volumes were determined in mmHg cm(-1) s(-1) for each peristaltic segment, and ratios of segment 3:segment 2 calculated. Values were compared to a cohort of 14 normal controls. KEY
RESULTS: A distinctive shift in peak contraction amplitude to segment 3 was evident in the acid sensitive group (segment 2, 100.03±11.06mmHg, segment 3, 145.23± 10.29mmHg, P=0.006). Pressure volumes were similarly shifted to segment 3 (segment 2: 855.3 ± 135.1 mmHg cm(-1)  s(-1) , segment 3: 2115.2±218.6 mmHg cm(-1) s(-1) , P<0.005). In contrast, peak amplitude and pressure volume were near equal in the two segments in GERD and control groups. A threshold segment 3:segment 2 pressure volume ratio of 1.9 had the best performance characteristic for segregating acid sensitivity subjects from all GERD and control subjects. CONCLUSIONS &amp; INFERENCES: Shift in contractile vigor to the third peristaltic segment may be seen in acid sensitive subjects. HRM characteristics of smooth muscle contraction segments are of value in making this determination.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21929566      PMCID: PMC3220773          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01787.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  35 in total

1.  Topographic analysis of esophageal double-peaked waves.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; A Alrakawi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Long-term outcome from tricyclic antidepressant treatment of functional chest pain.

Authors:  C Prakash; R E Clouse
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The effect of antisecretory therapy and study duration on ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Vladimir M Kushnir; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Quantitative assessment and characterization of visceral hyperalgesia evoked by esophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion in patients with functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and erosive esophagitis.

Authors:  Min Yang; Zhao-shen Li; Dong-feng Chen; Duo-wu Zou; Xiao-rong Xu; Dian-chun Fang; Guo-ming Xu; R L Stephens; Zheng-guo Wang
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  High-resolution manometric characteristics help differentiate types of distal esophageal obstruction in patients with peristalsis.

Authors:  C P Gyawali; V M Kushnir
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Neurophysiology of swallowing.

Authors:  Cumhur Ertekin; Ibrahim Aydogdu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Abnormal GERD parameters on ambulatory pH monitoring predict therapeutic success in noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Vladimir M Kushnir; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  The spectrum of motor function abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  D Ang; K Blondeau; D Sifrim; J Tack
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Long-term therapeutic outcome of patients undergoing ambulatory pH monitoring for chronic unexplained cough.

Authors:  Michael J Hersh; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.062

View more
  13 in total

1.  Exaggerated smooth muscle contraction segments on esophageal high-resolution manometry: prevalence and clinical relevance.

Authors:  M D Mello; S Duraiswamy; L H Price; Y Li; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Parameters on esophageal pH-impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation.

Authors:  A Patel; G S Sayuk; V M Kushnir; W W Chan; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Farhan Quader; Chanakyaram Reddy; Amit Patel; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 5.  What Is the Impact of High-Resolution Manometry in the Functional Diagnostic Workup of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?

Authors:  Jutta Keller
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-12

6.  Achalasia symptom response after Heller myotomy segregated by high-resolution manometry subtypes.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Ami Patel; Faiz A Mirza; Samad Soudagar; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Multiple rapid swallow responses segregate achalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  V Kushnir; G S Sayuk; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Prevalence, characteristics, and treatment outcomes of reflux hypersensitivity detected on pH-impedance monitoring.

Authors:  A Patel; G S Sayuk; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Acid-based parameters on pH-impedance testing predict symptom improvement with medical management better than impedance parameters.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Comparison of motor diagnoses by Chicago Classification versions 2.0 and 3.0 on esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  A Patel; B Cassell; N Sainani; D Wang; B Shahid; M Bennett; F A Mirza; S Munigala; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.