Literature DB >> 24732868

Acid-based parameters on pH-impedance testing predict symptom improvement with medical management better than impedance parameters.

Amit Patel1, Gregory S Sayuk1, C Prakash Gyawali1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: pH-impedance testing detects reflux events irrespective of pH, but its value in predicting treatment outcome is unclear. We prospectively evaluated subjects treated medically after pH-impedance testing to determine predictors of symptom improvement.
METHODS: Subjects referred for pH-impedance testing completed questionnaires in which dominant symptoms and global symptom severity (GSS) were recorded. Acid-reflux parameters (acid-exposure time, AET; symptom association by Ghillebert probability estimate, GPE; symptom index, SI) and impedance reflux parameters (reflux-exposure time, RET; number of reflux events; GPE and SI with impedance data) were extracted. Symptoms and GSS were prospectively reevaluated after medical therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined predictors of GSS improvement following medical management.
RESULTS: Over 5 years, 128 subjects (mean 53.3±1.3 years, 66.4% female; typical symptoms 57.0%, 53.9% tested on therapy) underwent pH-impedance testing and subsequent medical therapy for reflux symptoms, and completed required questionnaires. On follow-up 3.35±0.14 years later, mean GSS declined by 45.0%, with 42.2% patients reporting ≥50% GSS improvement. On univariate analysis, total AET, AET≥4.0%, and GPE for all reflux events predicted both linear and ≥50% GSS improvement, but RET and number of reflux events did not. On multivariate analysis, controlling for testing on or off therapy, only AET (P=0.003) and GPE for all reflux events (P=0.029) predicted GSS improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Acid-based reflux parameters offer greater value over impedance-based nonacid-reflux parameters in predicting symptomatic responses to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Our findings support conducting pH-impedance studies off PPI therapy to maximize clinical utility in predicting outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732868      PMCID: PMC4104528          DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  44 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  G M Campos; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; S Oberg; P F Crookes; S Tan; S R DeMeester; J A Hagen; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Esophageal impedance monitoring: the ups and downs of a new test.

Authors:  Steven Shay
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Daniel Sifrim; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  I Mainie; R Tutuian; A Agrawal; D Adams; D O Castell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Effect of esophageal emptying and saliva on clearance of acid from the esophagus.

Authors:  J F Helm; W J Dodds; L R Pelc; D W Palmer; W J Hogan; B C Teeter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Reflux monitoring: on or off therapy?

Authors:  Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Clinical, but not oesophageal pH-impedance, profiles predict response to proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Kafia Belhocine; Mireille Simon; Maylis Capdepont; François Mion; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Jean-Paul Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Effect of proton-pump inhibitor treatment on symptoms and quality of life in GERD patients depends on the symptom-reflux association.

Authors:  Marissa C Aanen; Bas L A M Weusten; Mattijs E Numans; Niek J de Wit; Melvin Samsom; André J P M Smout
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Reproducibility of symptom association analysis in ambulatory reflux monitoring.

Authors:  Marissa C Aanen; Albert J Bredenoord; Mattys E Numans; Melvin Samson; André J P M Smout
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  24 in total

1.  Parameters on esophageal pH-impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation.

Authors:  A Patel; G S Sayuk; V M Kushnir; W W Chan; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Interrogation of esophagogastric junction barrier function using the esophagogastric junction contractile integral: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  P Gor; Y Li; S Munigala; A Patel; A Bolkhir; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Achalasia symptom response after Heller myotomy segregated by high-resolution manometry subtypes.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Ami Patel; Faiz A Mirza; Samad Soudagar; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  pH Impedance vs. traditional pH monitoring in clinical practice: an outcome study.

Authors:  Delia Pugliese; Aurelio Mauro; Dario Consonni; Ivana Bravi; Andrea Tenca; Alessandra Elvevi; Dario Conte; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Pre-lung transplant measures of reflux on impedance are superior to pH testing alone in predicting early allograft injury.

Authors:  Wai-Kit Lo; Robert Burakoff; Hilary J Goldberg; Natan Feldman; Walter W Chan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Genetic risk factors for perception of symptoms in GERD: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  A Patel; S Hasak; B D Nix; G S Sayuk; R D Newberry; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 8.  Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Karthik Ravi; David A Katzka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Combined pH-impedance testing for reflux: current state of play and future challenges.

Authors:  Santosh Sanagapalli; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 10.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.