Literature DB >> 19920808

Abnormal GERD parameters on ambulatory pH monitoring predict therapeutic success in noncardiac chest pain.

Vladimir M Kushnir1, Gregory S Sayuk, C Prakash Gyawali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The value of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) indicators (acid exposure time (AET), symptom association probability (SAP), and symptom index (SI)) in predicting therapeutic success in noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) has not been systematically evaluated in outcome studies.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 98 subjects with NCCP (age 51.8+/-1.2 years, 75 women, mean duration of symptoms 7.3+/-0.4 years) who underwent pH monitoring off antireflux therapy. Distal esophageal AET (abnormal if > or = 4.0%), SAP (measured as Ghillibert probability estimate, abnormal if P<0.05), and SI (abnormal if > or = 50%) were calculated; symptom severity and change after therapy were assessed on a 10-point Likert scale. Subjects were interviewed 2.8+/-0.9 years after the pH study to determine the degree of symptom change (high-degree response (HDR), with definite, sustained symptom improvement) after antireflux therapy. Regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of HDR.
RESULTS: GERD indicators were present in 61 subjects (62.2%); 52 subjects (53.1%) had abnormal AET, 26 (26.5%) had positive SAP, and 25 (25.5%) had positive SI. With therapy, mean symptom scores improved from 6.3+/-0.3 at the time of the pH study to 2.9+/-0.3 at the time of interview (P<0.001). A total of 58 subjects (59.2%) achieved HDR, and another 29.6% had moderate symptom improvement. On univariate analysis, HDR was associated with positive SAP (P=0.003) and elevated AET (P=0.015) but not with demographics, SI, or esophageal motor pattern. In regression analysis containing demographics, GERD indicators, psychiatric comorbidity, and esophageal motor pattern, positive SAP was retained as a significant predictor of HDR (P=0.003); elevated AET trended toward significance (P=0.055). Frequency of HDR was highest when subjects had all three GERD parameters abnormal (93.3% HDR) or both elevated AET and positive SAP (88.2% HDR, P<0.001 compared with only one or no GERD parameter abnormal).
CONCLUSIONS: Positive statistical tests of symptom association predict the therapeutic success of GERD management in NCCP. When used hierarchically, response to antireflux therapy is best predicted when GERD parameters are all abnormal and poorest when parameters are normal. These results support the importance of GERD, the relevance of symptom association testing during ambulatory pH monitoring, and the value of intensive antireflux therapy in NCCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19920808      PMCID: PMC3835753          DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  24 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  G M Campos; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; S Oberg; P F Crookes; S Tan; S R DeMeester; J A Hagen; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Noncardiac chest pain-treatment approaches.

Authors:  Sami R Achem
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 3.  The proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in GERD: does it still have a role?

Authors:  Anita Gasiorowska; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Nonacid reflux in patients with chronic cough on acid-suppressive therapy.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Inder Mainie; Amit Agrawal; David Adams; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Is proton pump inhibitor testing an effective approach to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with noncardiac chest pain?: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Hong Wang; Jia Qing Huang; Ge Fan Zheng; Wai Man Wong; Shiu Kum Lam; Johan Karlberg; Harry H X Xia; Ronnie Fass; Benjamin C Y Wong
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-13

6.  Symptom association probability and symptom sensitivity index: preferable but still suboptimal predictors of response to high dose omeprazole.

Authors:  S A Taghavi; M Ghasedi; M Saberi-Firoozi; M Alizadeh-Naeeni; K Bagheri-Lankarani; M J Kaviani; L Hamidpour
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash; Ray E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing.

Authors:  Ikuo Hirano; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Review article: the role of pH monitoring in extraoesophageal gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M F Vaezi
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Wireless pH monitoring in patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash; Ray E Clouse
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  19 in total

1.  Exaggerated smooth muscle contraction segments on esophageal high-resolution manometry: prevalence and clinical relevance.

Authors:  M D Mello; S Duraiswamy; L H Price; Y Li; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Esophageal hypersensitivity.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-08

3.  Parameters on esophageal pH-impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation.

Authors:  A Patel; G S Sayuk; V M Kushnir; W W Chan; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  The effect of antisecretory therapy and study duration on ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Vladimir M Kushnir; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.

Authors:  John Pandolfino; John Lipham; Amarpreet Chawla; Nicole Ferko; Andrew Hogan; Rana A Qadeer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Achalasia symptom response after Heller myotomy segregated by high-resolution manometry subtypes.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Ami Patel; Faiz A Mirza; Samad Soudagar; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  High resolution manometry patterns distinguish acid sensitivity in non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  V M Kushnir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Assessment of concordance of symptom reflux association tests in ambulatory pH monitoring.

Authors:  V M Kushnir; A Sathyamurthy; J Drapekin; S Gaddam; G S Sayuk; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 10.  The role of oesophageal physiological testing in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.