Literature DB >> 22788116

Multiple rapid swallow responses segregate achalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry.

V Kushnir1, G S Sayuk, C P Gyawali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) inhibit esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tone; a rebound excitatory response then results in an exaggerated peristaltic sequence. Multiple rapid swallows responses are dependent on intact inhibitory and excitatory neural function and could vary by subtype in achalasia spectrum disorders.
METHODS: Consecutive subjects with incomplete LES relaxation on high-resolution manometry (HRM) (Sierra Scientific, Los Angeles, CA, USA) in the absence of mechanical obstruction were prospectively identified. Achalasia spectrum disorders were classified and HRM plots reviewed according to Chicago criteria. Esophageal peristaltic performance and LES function were assessed after 10 wet swallows and MRS (five 2 mL water swallows 2-3 s apart). Findings were compared with 18 healthy controls (28.5 ± 0.6 years, 44% women). KEY
RESULTS: A total of 46 subjects (57.1 ± 2.1 years, 52.2% women) met inclusion criteria. There was complete failure of peristalsis with MRS in all subjects with achalasia subtypes 1 and 2. In contrast, 80% of achalasia subtype 3 and incomplete LES relaxation (EGJ outflow obstruction) with preserved esophageal body peristalsis had a contractile response to MRS (P < 0.001 compared with subtypes 1 and 2); controls demonstrated 94.4% peristalsis. Percent decrease in LES residual pressure during MRS (compared to wet swallows) segregated achalasia subtypes; those with aperistalsis (subtypes 1 and 2) had a lesser decline (22.6%) compared to those with retained esophageal body peristalsis (40.5%) and controls (51.3%, P < 0.001 across groups). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Multiple rapid swallow responses segregate achalasia spectrum disorders into two patterns differentiated by presence or absence of esophageal body contraction response to wet swallows. These findings support subtyping of achalasia, with pathophysiologic implications.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22788116      PMCID: PMC3508286          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01971.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  32 in total

1.  Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  High resolution manometry patterns distinguish acid sensitivity in non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  V M Kushnir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Distal esophageal spasm in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; Dustin Carlson; Daniel Luger; Kiran Bidari; Lubomyr Boris; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  A unique esophageal motor pattern that involves longitudinal muscles is responsible for emptying in achalasia esophagus.

Authors:  Su Jin Hong; Valmik Bhargava; Yanfen Jiang; Debbie Denboer; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achalasia.

Authors:  J R Goldblum; T W Rice; J E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  High-resolution manometric characteristics help differentiate types of distal esophageal obstruction in patients with peristalsis.

Authors:  C P Gyawali; V M Kushnir
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  The hypersensitive esophagus: pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment options.

Authors:  Jose M Remes-Troche
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2010-10

9.  Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.

Authors:  P O Katz; C B Dalton; J E Richter; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  21 in total

1.  Achalasia symptom response after Heller myotomy segregated by high-resolution manometry subtypes.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Ami Patel; Faiz A Mirza; Samad Soudagar; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Achalasia: It Is Not All Black and White.

Authors:  Santosh Sanagapalli; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-06

3.  Maturation Modulates Pharyngeal-Stimulus Provoked Pharyngeal and Respiratory Rhythms in Human Infants.

Authors:  Kathryn A Hasenstab; Swetha Sitaram; Ivan M Lang; Reza Shaker; Sudarshan R Jadcherla
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Mechanisms of repetitive retrograde contractions in response to sustained esophageal distension: a study evaluating patients with postfundoplication dysphagia.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Peter J Kahrilas; Katherine Ritter; Zhiyue Lin; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

6.  Identification of Quality Measures for Performance of and Interpretation of Data From Esophageal Manometry.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Andrew J Gawron; Rajesh N Keswani; Karl Bilimoria; Donald O Castell; Kerry B Dunbar; Chandra P Gyawali; Blair A Jobe; Philip O Katz; David A Katzka; Brian E Lacy; Benson T Massey; Joel E Richter; Felice Schnoll-Sussman; Stuart J Spechler; Roger Tatum; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Reproducibility patterns of multiple rapid swallows during high resolution esophageal manometry provide insights into esophageal pathophysiology.

Authors:  L H Price; Y Li; A Patel; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  Clinical Practice Update: The Use of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia: Expert Review and Best Practice Advice From the AGA Institute.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; David Katzka; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Histopathologic patterns among achalasia subtypes.

Authors:  J B Sodikoff; A A Lo; B B Shetuni; P J Kahrilas; G-Y Yang; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 10.  The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Guy Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.