Literature DB >> 16623681

Don't talk about pink elephants! Speaker's control over leaking private information during language production.

Liane Wardlow Lane1, Michelle Groisman, Victor S Ferreira.   

Abstract

Speakers' descriptions sometimes inappropriately refer to information known only to them, thereby "leaking" knowledge of that private information. We evaluated whether speakers can explicitly control such leakage in light of its communicative consequences. Speakers described mutually known objects (e.g., a triangle) that had size-contrasting matches that were privileged to the speakers (e.g., a larger triangle visible to the speakers only), so that use of a contrasting adjective (e.g., small) involved referring to the privileged information. Half the time, speakers were instructed to conceal the identity of the privileged object. If speakers can control their leaked references to privileged information, this conceal instruction should make such references less likely. Surprisingly, the conceal instruction caused speakers to refer to privileged objects more than they did in the baseline condition. Thus, not only do speakers have difficulty not leaking privileged information, but attempts to avoid such leakage only make it more likely.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16623681      PMCID: PMC1868699          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01697.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  5 in total

1.  Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension.

Authors:  B Keysar; D J Barr; J A Balin; J S Brauner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution.

Authors:  Aparna S Nadig; Julie C Sedivy
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  When do speakers take into account common ground?

Authors:  W S Horton; B Keysar
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-04

Review 5.  Ironic processes of mental control.

Authors:  D M Wegner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

  5 in total
  22 in total

1.  The distractor picture paradox in speech production: evidence from the word translation task.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-05-29

2.  Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation.

Authors:  Si On Yoon; Sungryong Koh; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts.

Authors:  Jennifer Arnold; Zenzi M Griffin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 4.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

5.  A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-28

6.  To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.

Authors:  Daphna Heller; Kristen S Gorman; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-03-02

7.  To err is human; to structurally prime from errors is also human.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.

Authors:  Kristen S Gorman; Whitney Gegg-Harrison; Chelsea R Marsh; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The cognitive mechanisms underlying perspective taking between conversational partners: evidence from speakers with Alzheimer׳s disease.

Authors:  Liane Wardlow; Iva Ivanova; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: do cognitive demands override threats to referential success?

Authors:  Liane Wardlow Lane; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.