Literature DB >> 15582623

The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language.

Elsi Kaiser1, John C Trueswell.   

Abstract

On-line comprehension studies of flexible word-order languages find that noncanonical ('scrambled') structures induce more difficulty than canonical structures [e.g., Hyona & Hujanen, Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 50A (1997) 841-858], with this difference being attributed to the structural complexity/infrequency of these forms. However, by presenting sentences in isolation, most existing studies have not examined the extent to which processing patterns can be explained by discourse factors. In Finnish, an articleless flexible word-order language with canonical SVO order, word order can be used to encode the given/new distinctions: OVS marks the object as given and the subject as new; SVO is more flexible, being used in multiple contexts. Thus, the observed dispreference for noncanonical orders in previous work may arise from additional presuppositions needed to understand them out of context [cf. Crain & Steedman, Natural Language Parsing, (1985), 320-358]. Two experiments were conducted to examine these issues in Finnish. Experiment 1 used a self-paced reading task to show that the usual difficulty associated with noncanonical constructions is partially alleviated in the presence of appropriate discourse contexts. In Experiment 2, the eye gaze of listeners was tracked as they heard spoken descriptions of scenes, so as to test whether specific on-line referential processes are involved in SVO/OVS comprehension: Upon hearing an OV... sequence, Finnish listeners should expect the upcoming noun to be discourse-new, whereas an SV... sequence makes no such prediction. The results confirmed these predictions. As compared to SVO, OVS sentences showed anticipatory eye movements to a discourse-new referent at the second noun onset, even before participants had enough acoustic information to recognize this word. Our findings illustrate that in a flexible word-order language, a noncanonical order can result in anticipatory processes regarding the discourse status of a yet-to-be-heard constituent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15582623     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  21 in total

1.  Neural correlates of noncanonical syntactic processing revealed by a picture-sentence matching task.

Authors:  Ryuta Kinno; Mitsuru Kawamura; Seiji Shioda; Kuniyoshi L Sakai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication.

Authors:  Steven T Piantadosi; Harry Tily; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Processing of a free word order language: the role of syntax and context.

Authors:  Natalia Slioussar
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-08

4.  Context improves comprehension of fronted objects.

Authors:  Line Burholt Kristensen; Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen; Mads Poulsen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-04

5.  Interaction Between Syntactic Structure and Information Structure in the Processing of a Head-Final Language.

Authors:  Masatoshi Koizumi; Satoshi Imamura
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

6.  Scalar reference, contrast and discourse: Separating effects of linguistic discourse from availability of the referent.

Authors:  Lynsey Wolter; Kristen Skovbroten Gorman; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Context-driven expectations about focus alternatives.

Authors:  Christina S Kim; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Jeffrey T Runner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-03-19

9.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Serial or parallel? Using depth-of-processing to examine attention allocation during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Polina M Vanyukov; Patryk A Laurent; Tessa Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.