Literature DB >> 21915746

Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry.

Rolf Sobottke1, Emin Aghayev, Christoph Röder, Peer Eysel, Stephan K Delank, Thomas Zweig.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Published opinions regarding the outcomes and complications in older patients have a broad spectrum and there is a disagreement whether surgery in older patients entails a higher risk. Therefore this study examines the risk of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis relative to age in the pooled data set of the Spine Tango registry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2005 and February 2010 the database query resulted in 1,764 patients. The patients were subdivided into three socio-economically relevant age groups: <65 years, 65-74 years, ≥75 years. Frequencies for occurred surgical, general and follow-up complications were assessed. Multivariate and univariate logistic regressions were performed to reveal predictors for respective complication types. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our study found that age, ASA status and blood loss were significant co-varieties for the occurrence of general complications. The risk of general complications is increased in older versus younger patients. Fusion or rigid stabilization does not lead to more complications. Surgical complications as well as complication rates at follow-up showed no significant age-related variation. Physician-based outcome was good or excellent in over 80% of patients in all age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21915746      PMCID: PMC3296840          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2016-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

Review 1.  How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango.

Authors:  T Zweig; A F Mannion; D Grob; M Melloh; E Munting; A Tuschel; M Aebi; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Lumbar spinal fusion. Surgical rates, costs, and complications.

Authors:  J N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; J D Loeser; S J Bigos; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  R W Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Annertz; C Sjöberg; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older.

Authors:  Ashraf A Ragab; Mark A Fye; Henry H Bohlman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people.

Authors:  P L Sanderson; P L Wood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-05

8.  Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis.

Authors:  H R Silvers; P J Lewis; H L Asch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; E M Simonsick; M E Salive; R B Wallace
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations.

Authors:  M A Ciol; R A Deyo; E Howell; S Kreif
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  24 in total

1.  A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Marek Szpalski; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Should age be a contraindication for degenerative lumbar surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; Carlos Lozano-Álvarez; Guillem Saló; Antoni Molina; Andreu Lladó; Lluís Puig-Verdié; Manuel Ramírez-Valencia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Development of a model to predict the probability of incurring a complication during spine surgery.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Ulrike Held; Tim Pigott; Andrea Luca; Markus Loibl; Raluca Reitmeir; Tamás Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar multifidus muscle predict clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal decompression for symptomatic spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Mario G T Zotti; F Vilas Boas; T Clifton; M Piche; W W Yoon; B J C Freeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2012.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Everard Munting; Christoph Röder; Rolf Sobottke; Daniel Dietrich; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Is the duration of pre-operative conservative treatment associated with the clinical outcome following surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis? A study based on the Spine Tango Registry.

Authors:  Thomas Zweig; Juliane Enke; Anne F Mannion; Rolf Sobottke; Markus Melloh; Brian J C Freeman; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Predictors of improvement in quality of life and pain relief in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age: a study based on the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Christian Herren; Jan Siewe; Anne F Mannion; Christoph Röder; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Interspinous process devices for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mao Li; Huilin Yang; Genlin Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 10.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.