BACKGROUND: Functional assessment is an important part of the evaluation of elderly persons. We conducted this study to determine whether objective measures of physical function can predict subsequent disability in older persons. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included men and women 71 years of age or older who were living in the community, who reported no disability in the activities of daily living, and who reported that they were able to walk one-half mile (0.8 km) and climb stairs without assistance. The subjects completed a short battery of physical-performance tests and participated in a follow-up interview four years later. The tests included an assessment of standing balance, a timed 8-ft (2.4-m) walk at a normal pace, and a timed test of five repetitions of rising from a chair and sitting down. RESULTS: Among the 1122 subjects who were not disabled at base line and who participated in the four-year follow-up, lower scores on the base-line performance tests were associated with a statistically significant, graduated increase in the frequency of disability in the activities of daily living and mobility-related disability at follow-up. After adjustment for age, sex, and the presence of chronic disease, those with the lowest scores on the performance tests were 4.2 to 4.9 times as likely to have disability at four years as those with the highest performance scores, and those with intermediate performance scores were 1.6 to 1.8 times as likely to have disability. CONCLUSIONS: Among nondisabled older persons living in the community, objective measures of lower-extremity function were highly predictive of subsequent disability. Measures of physical performance may identify older persons with a preclinical stage of disability who may benefit from interventions to prevent the development of frank disability.
BACKGROUND: Functional assessment is an important part of the evaluation of elderly persons. We conducted this study to determine whether objective measures of physical function can predict subsequent disability in older persons. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included men and women 71 years of age or older who were living in the community, who reported no disability in the activities of daily living, and who reported that they were able to walk one-half mile (0.8 km) and climb stairs without assistance. The subjects completed a short battery of physical-performance tests and participated in a follow-up interview four years later. The tests included an assessment of standing balance, a timed 8-ft (2.4-m) walk at a normal pace, and a timed test of five repetitions of rising from a chair and sitting down. RESULTS: Among the 1122 subjects who were not disabled at base line and who participated in the four-year follow-up, lower scores on the base-line performance tests were associated with a statistically significant, graduated increase in the frequency of disability in the activities of daily living and mobility-related disability at follow-up. After adjustment for age, sex, and the presence of chronic disease, those with the lowest scores on the performance tests were 4.2 to 4.9 times as likely to have disability at four years as those with the highest performance scores, and those with intermediate performance scores were 1.6 to 1.8 times as likely to have disability. CONCLUSIONS: Among nondisabled older persons living in the community, objective measures of lower-extremity function were highly predictive of subsequent disability. Measures of physical performance may identify older persons with a preclinical stage of disability who may benefit from interventions to prevent the development of frank disability.
Authors: Ngaire Kerse; Karen J Hayman; Simon A Moyes; Kathy Peri; Elizabeth Robinson; Anthony Dowell; Gregory S Kolt; C Raina Elley; Simon Hatcher; Liz Kiata; Janine Wiles; Sally Keeling; John Parsons; Bruce Arroll Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Kiang Liu; Luigi Ferrucci; Lu Tian; Jack M Guralnik; Yihua Liao; Michael H Criqui Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marla K Beauchamp; Suzanne G Leveille; Kushang V Patel; Dan K Kiely; Caroline L Phillips; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Jack M Guralnik; Lu Tian; Luigi Ferrucci; Kiang Liu; Yihua Liao; Michael H Criqui Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Danit R Shahar; Denise K Houston; Trisha F Hue; Jung-Sun Lee; Nadine R Sahyoun; Frances A Tylavsky; Diklah Geva; Hillel Vardi; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Barbara Sternfeld; Alicia Colvin; Andrea Stewart; Sheila Dugan; Lisa Nackers; Samar R El Khoudary; Mei-Hua Huang; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 5.411