Literature DB >> 8496206

Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people.

P L Sanderson1, P L Wood.   

Abstract

We have reviewed 31 consecutive patients, aged 65 years or more, after surgical decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The average follow-up was 42 months. Assessment included a standard questionnaire, a pain diagram which was completed by the patient, and clinical and radiological examination. Patients were considered in three groups; degenerative spondylolisthesis (19), lateral recess stenosis (5), and central-mixed stenosis (7). The indication for surgery was leg pain: no patient had an operation for back pain alone. Fusion was never performed. Overall, 64% of the patients had an excellent result, 17% a good result and 19% a poor result. We conclude that the long-term outcome of decompressive surgery in the elderly is good; it does not differ from that reported for younger patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8496206     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  23 in total

1.  Elective lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: is it a high-risk operation?

Authors:  Rudolf Reindl; Thomas Steffen; Lara Cohen; Max Aebi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Zeev Arinzon; Yoram Folman; Josef Leitner; Rami David; Evgeny Pevzner; Reuven Gepstein; Ilya Pekarsky; Ishay Shuval
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Spinal surgery in the elderly: does age have an influence on the complication rate?].

Authors:  R Sobottke; G Csécsei; T Kaulhausen; S Delank; J Franklin; E Aghayev; T Zweig; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Christoph P Hofstetter; Anna S Hofer; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

5.  Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Emin Aghayev; Christoph Röder; Peer Eysel; Stephan K Delank; Thomas Zweig
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predictors of improvement in quality of life and pain relief in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age: a study based on the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Christian Herren; Jan Siewe; Anne F Mannion; Christoph Röder; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Less invasive and less technically demanding decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis--appropriate for general orthopaedic surgeons?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Takamitsu Okada; Kensuke Fukushima; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Hiroyuki Sakagami; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Toshiaki Kotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  An evaluation of the effectiveness of hyaluronidase in the selective nerve root block of radiculopathy: a double blind, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sang-Bong Ko; Alexander R Vaccaro; Ho-Jin Chang; Dong-Young Shin
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-02-13

9.  Lumbar spine surgery in patients 80 years of age or older: morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  L Balabaud; S Pitel; I Caux; C Dova; B Richard; P Antonietti; C Mazel
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-30

10.  Pain drawing in the evaluation of low back pain.

Authors:  K Takata; H Hirotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.