Literature DB >> 22661202

A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Marc Du Bois1, Marek Szpalski, Peter Donceel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose is to study rates, trends, geographic variations and outcome of lumbar spine surgery in the Belgian population during the last decade.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using administrative data of the largest Belgian sickness fund from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2009. Cases included lumbar laminectomy, combined discectomy and fusion, posterior interarticular fusion, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and standard discectomy. The main outcome measures were age- and sex-adjusted rates of lumbar spine surgery, 1-year mortality, 1-year iterative surgery, no return to work (RTW) rate 1 year after surgery and length of hospital stay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between age, sex, geographic region, type of surgery, year of intervention and duration of pre-operative sick leave on outcome.
RESULTS: Spine surgery rates rose 44 % from 2001 through 2009 and data for 2009 showed twofold variations in spine surgery rates among 10 Belgian provinces. Reported 1-year mortality varied from 0.6 to 2.5 % among surgical procedures performed in 2008. The overall 5-year reoperation rate was 12 %. RTW rates 1 year after standard discectomy, ALIF, PLIF and combined discectomy and fusion for the follow-up sample of 2008 were 14.4, 22.7, 26.1 and 30.6 %, respectively. The median length of hospital stay significantly decreased throughout the decade. Type of surgery and geographic region were significantly related to patient outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Regional variations highlight professional uncertainty and controversy. The study results point to the need for peer comparisons and surgeon feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661202      PMCID: PMC3508248          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2381-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  36 in total

1.  United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Patrick R Olson; Kristen K Bronner; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Lumbar fusion outcomes in Washington State workers' compensation.

Authors:  Sham Maghout Juratli; Gary M Franklin; Sohail K Mirza; Thomas M Wickizer; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Bart W Koes; Ralph T W M Thomeer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-07

4.  Predicting factors of successful recovery from lumbar spine surgery among workers' compensation patients.

Authors:  S D Hodges; S C Humphreys; J C Eck; L A Covington; H Harrom
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2001-02

5.  Outcomes of posterolateral lumbar fusion in Utah patients receiving workers' compensation: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  M S DeBerard; K S Masters; A L Colledge; R L Schleusener; J D Schlegel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered?

Authors:  Ralf D Rothoerl; Chris Woertgen; Alexander Brawanski
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.

Authors:  Wilco C Peul; Hans C van Houwelingen; Wilbert B van den Hout; Ronald Brand; Just A H Eekhof; Joseph T J Tans; Ralph T W M Thomeer; Bart W Koes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Geographic variation in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders: 1990 to 2000.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Guilherme Cunha M Santos; Raquel Lima; Ricardo Pietrobon; Danny O Jacobs; William Richardson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 10.  Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Jamie Baisden; Eugene J Carragee; Daniel K Resnick; William O Shaffer; John D Loeser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Learning curve and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Chuan Guo; Qingquan Kong; Bin Zhang; Yu Wang; Lifeng Zhang; Hao Wu; Zhiyu Peng; Yuqing Yan; Dongfeng Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

Authors:  Shuheng Zhai; Wenkui Zhao; Bin Zhu; Xin Huang; Chen Liang; Bao Hai; Lixiang Ding; Hongwei Zhu; Xianhai Wang; Feng Wei; Hongling Chu; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Time spent per patient in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Waiting for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: suffering and a possibility to discover coping abilities.

Authors:  Björn Knutsson; Mats Jong; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén; Marika Augutis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  Impact of the Economic Downturn on Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States: A National Trend Analysis, 2003 to 2013.

Authors:  David N Bernstein; David Brodell; Yue Li; Paul T Rubery; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06

6.  Dynamic Changes of Cauda Equina Motion Before and After Decompressive Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Redundant Nerve Roots: Cauda Equina Activation Sign.

Authors:  Yosuke Kawasaki; Atsushi Seichi; Liuzhe Zhang; Shoichiro Tani; Atsushi Kimura
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-02-13

7.  Comparison between modified facet joint fusion and posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhimin Li; Zheng Li; Xin Chen; Xiao Han; Kuan Li; Shugang Li
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Generalization of fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior as predictors of work resumption after back surgery: a study protocol for a prospective study (WABS).

Authors:  Ann Meulders; Rini Masuy; Lotte Bamelis; Katleen Bogaerts; Bart Depreitere; Kris De Smedt; Jeroen Ceuppens; Bert Lenaert; Sarah Lonneville; Dieter Peuskens; Johan Van Lerbeirghe; Patrick Van Schaeybroeck; Peter Vorlat; Steefka Zijlstra; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-02-22

9.  Lumbar decompression and lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Hui Yang; Wei Liu; Jian Li; Wen-Yi Zhu; Li-Kun An; Shuo Yuan; Han Ke; Lei Zang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression versus Open Decompression and Fusion Surgery for the Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Qingpeng Song; Bin Zhu; Wenkui Zhao; Chen Liang; Bao Hai; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.133

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.