Literature DB >> 21912926

Effects of humic acid on DNA quantification with Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification kit and short tandem repeat amplification efficiency.

Seung Bum Seo1, Hye Young Lee, Ai Hua Zhang, Hye Yeon Kim, Dong Hoon Shin, Soong Deok Lee.   

Abstract

Correct DNA quantification is an essential part to obtain reliable STR typing results. Forensic DNA analysts often use commercial kits for DNA quantification; among them, real-time-based DNA quantification kits are most frequently used. Incorrect DNA quantification due to the presence of PCR inhibitors may affect experiment results. In this study, we examined the alteration degree of DNA quantification results estimated in DNA samples containing a PCR inhibitor by using a Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification kit. For experiments, we prepared approximately 0.25 ng/μl DNA samples containing various concentrations of humic acid (HA). The quantification results were 0.194-0.303 ng/μl at 0-1.6 ng/μl HA (final concentration in the Quantifiler reaction) and 0.003-0.168 ng/μl at 2.4-4.0 ng/μl HA. Most DNA quantity was undetermined when HA concentration was higher than 4.8 ng/μl HA. The C (T) values of an internal PCR control (IPC) were 28.0-31.0, 36.5-37.1, and undetermined at 0-1.6, 2.4, and 3.2 ng/μl HA. These results indicate that underestimated DNA quantification results may be obtained in the DNA sample with high C (T) values of IPC. Thus, researchers should carefully interpret the DNA quantification results. We additionally examined the effects of HA on the STR amplification by using an Identifiler® kit and a MiniFiler™ kit. Based on the results of this study, it is thought that a better understanding of various effects of HA would help researchers recognize and manipulate samples containing HA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912926     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-011-0616-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  18 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of DNA in forensic samples.

Authors:  Janice A Nicklas; Eric Buel
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Mechanisms underlying the impact of humic acids on DNA quantification by SYBR Green I and consequences for the analysis of soils and aquatic sediments.

Authors:  Hubert Zipper; Christiane Buta; Katrin Lämmle; Herwig Brunner; Jürgen Bernhagen; Frank Vitzthum
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Validation of testing and interpretation protocols for low template DNA samples using AmpFlSTR Identifiler.

Authors:  Theresa Caragine; Rebecca Mikulasovich; Jeannie Tamariz; Ewelina Bajda; James Sebestyen; Howard Baum; Mechthild Prinz
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  Kinship and Y-chromosome analysis of 7th century human remains: novel DNA extraction and typing procedure for ancient material.

Authors:  Daniel Vanek; Lenka Saskova; Hubert Koch
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR Amplification Kit: a MiniSTR multiplex for the analysis of degraded and/or PCR inhibited DNA.

Authors:  Julio J Mulero; Chien Wei Chang; Robert E Lagacé; Dennis Y Wang; Jennifer L Bas; Timothy P McMahon; Lori K Hennessy
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.832

6.  Technical note: Efficiency of total demineralization and ion-exchange column for DNA extraction from bone.

Authors:  Seung Bum Seo; Aihua Zhang; Hye Yeon Kim; Jin A Yi; Hye Young Lee; Dong Hoon Shin; Soong Deok Lee
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people.

Authors:  Christine Keyser; Caroline Bouakaze; Eric Crubézy; Valery G Nikolaev; Daniel Montagnon; Tatiana Reis; Bertrand Ludes
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Comparison of five DNA quantification methods.

Authors:  Karsten Nielsen; Helle Smidt Mogensen; Johannes Hedman; Harald Niederstätter; Walther Parson; Niels Morling
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.882

9.  Skeletal remains from World War II mass grave: from discovery to identification.

Authors:  Marija Definis Gojanović; Davorka Sutlović
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.351

10.  Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples.

Authors:  Milko B Kermekchiev; Lyubka I Kirilova; Erika E Vail; Wayne M Barnes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effective removal of co-purified inhibitors from extracted DNA samples using synchronous coefficient of drag alteration (SCODA) technology.

Authors:  Sarah Schmedes; Pamela Marshall; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.