Literature DB >> 12739098

Quantification of DNA in forensic samples.

Janice A Nicklas1, Eric Buel.   

Abstract

Quantification of DNA in a forensic sample is of major importance for proper DNA amplification and STR profiling. Several methods have been developed to quantify DNA, from basic UV spectrometry, through gel-based techniques, to dye staining, blotting techniques, and, very recently, DNA amplification methods (polymerase chain reaction, PCR). Early techniques simply measured total DNA, but newer techniques can specifically measure human DNA while excluding non-human DNA (foodstuff, animal, or bacterial contamination). These newer assays can be faster and less expensive than traditional methods, making them ideal for the busy forensic laboratory. This paper reviews classic and newer quantification techniques and presents methods recently developed by the authors on the basis of PCR of Alu sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12739098     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-003-1924-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  11 in total

1.  Laboratory methods for the analysis of primate mobile elements.

Authors:  David A Ray; Kyudong Han; Jerilyn A Walker; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

2.  Effects of humic acid on DNA quantification with Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification kit and short tandem repeat amplification efficiency.

Authors:  Seung Bum Seo; Hye Young Lee; Ai Hua Zhang; Hye Yeon Kim; Dong Hoon Shin; Soong Deok Lee
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Extraction and electrochemical detection for quantification of trace-level DNA.

Authors:  Suparat Cotchim; Panote Thavarungkul; Proespichaya Kanatharana; Phuvadol Thanakiatkrai; Thitika Kitpipit; Warakorn Limbut
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  Quantification of trace-level DNA by real-time whole genome amplification.

Authors:  Min-Jung Kang; Hannah Yu; Sook-Kyung Kim; Sang-Ryoul Park; Inchul Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Improved multiple displacement amplification (iMDA) and ultraclean reagents.

Authors:  S Timothy Motley; John M Picuri; Chris D Crowder; Jeremiah J Minich; Steven A Hofstadler; Mark W Eshoo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Glycerolized Reticular Dermis as a New Human Acellular Dermal Matrix: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Pietro Maria Ferrando; Davide Balmativola; Irene Cambieri; Maria Stella Scalzo; Massimiliano Bergallo; Laura Annaratone; Stefania Casarin; Mara Fumagalli; Maurizio Stella; Anna Sapino; Carlotta Castagnoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of DNA quantification methodology used in the DNA extraction protocol for the UK Biobank cohort.

Authors:  Samantha Welsh; Tim Peakman; Simon Sheard; Rachael Almond
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Fragmentation of DNA affects the accuracy of the DNA quantitation by the commonly used methods.

Authors:  Tatiana Sedlackova; Gabriela Repiska; Peter Celec; Tomas Szemes; Gabriel Minarik
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.244

9.  Nanoparticle-based detection and quantification of DNA with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discrimination selectivity.

Authors:  Wei Jie Qin; Lin Yue Lanry Yung
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Microfluidic Devices for Forensic DNA Analysis: A Review.

Authors:  Brigitte Bruijns; Arian van Asten; Roald Tiggelaar; Han Gardeniers
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.