Literature DB >> 19083825

Comparison of five DNA quantification methods.

Karsten Nielsen1, Helle Smidt Mogensen, Johannes Hedman, Harald Niederstätter, Walther Parson, Niels Morling.   

Abstract

Six commercial preparations of human genomic DNA were quantified using five quantification methods: UV spectrometry, SYBR-Green dye staining, slot blot hybridization with the probe D17Z1, Quantifiler Human DNA Quantification kit and RB1 rt-PCR. All methods measured higher DNA concentrations than expected based on the information by the manufacturers. UV spectrometry, SYBR-Green dye staining, slot blot and RB1 rt-PCR gave 39, 27, 11 and 12%, respectively, higher concentrations than expected based on the manufacturers' information. The DNA preparations were quantified using the Quantifiler Human DNA Quantification kit in two experiments. The measured DNA concentrations with Quantifiler were 125 and 160% higher than expected based on the manufacturers' information. When the Quantifiler human DNA standard (Raji cell line) was replaced by the commercial human DNA preparation G147A (Promega) to generate the DNA standard curve in the Quantifiler Human DNA Quantification kit, the DNA quantification results of the human DNA preparations were 31% higher than expected based on the manufacturers' information. The results indicate a calibration problem with the Quantifiler human DNA standard for its use with the Quantifiler Human DNA Quantification kit. The possible reasons for the problem are discussed and a solution is suggested. The results emphasise the need for standard reference DNA material and standard methods for DNA quantification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19083825     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  7 in total

1.  Absolute Quantification of RNA or DNA Using Acid Hydrolysis and Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Mark S Lowenthal; Eva Quittman; Karen W Phinney
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Effects of humic acid on DNA quantification with Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification kit and short tandem repeat amplification efficiency.

Authors:  Seung Bum Seo; Hye Young Lee; Ai Hua Zhang; Hye Yeon Kim; Dong Hoon Shin; Soong Deok Lee
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Targeted KRAS mutation assessment on patient tumor histologic material in real time diagnostics.

Authors:  Vassiliki Kotoula; Elpida Charalambous; Bart Biesmans; Andigoni Malousi; Eleni Vrettou; George Fountzilas; George Karkavelas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of DNA quantification methodology used in the DNA extraction protocol for the UK Biobank cohort.

Authors:  Samantha Welsh; Tim Peakman; Simon Sheard; Rachael Almond
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Improving the standardization of mRNA measurement by RT-qPCR.

Authors:  Rebecca Sanders; Stephen Bustin; Jim Huggett; Deborah Mason
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2018-03-16

6.  DNA extract characterization process for microbial detection methods development and validation.

Authors:  Nathan D Olson; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-12-03

7.  Development of a robust DNA quality and quantity assessment qPCR assay for targeted next-generation sequencing library preparation.

Authors:  Jennifer Dang; Pedro Mendez; Sharon Lee; James W Kim; Jun-Hee Yoon; Thomas W Kim; Charles J Sailey; David M Jablons; Il-Jin Kim
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.650

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.