Literature DB >> 21911739

Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory.

Paul M Bays1, Nikos Gorgoraptis, Natalie Wee, Louise Marshall, Masud Husain.   

Abstract

The process of encoding a visual scene into working memory has previously been studied using binary measures of recall. Here, we examine the temporal evolution of memory resolution, based on observers' ability to reproduce the orientations of objects presented in brief, masked displays. Recall precision was accurately described by the interaction of two independent constraints: an encoding limit that determines the maximum rate at which information can be transferred into memory and a separate storage limit that determines the maximum fidelity with which information can be maintained. Recall variability decreased incrementally with time, consistent with a parallel encoding process in which visual information from multiple objects accumulates simultaneously in working memory. No evidence was observed for a limit on the number of items stored. Cuing one display item with a brief flash led to rapid development of a recall advantage for that item. This advantage was short-lived if the cue was simply a salient visual event but was maintained if it indicated an object of particular relevance to the task. These cuing effects were observed even for items that had already been encoded into memory, indicating that limited memory resources can be rapidly reallocated to prioritize salient or goal-relevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21911739      PMCID: PMC3401684          DOI: 10.1167/11.10.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  43 in total

1.  Capacity limitations of visual memory in two-interval comparison of Gabor arrays.

Authors:  Louise Lakha; Michael J Wright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Iconic memory.

Authors:  M Coltheart
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05
View more
  69 in total

1.  The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-22

2.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access from the perspective of capacity-unlimited working memory.

Authors:  Steven Gross
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Fundamental limits on persistent activity in networks of noisy neurons.

Authors:  Yoram Burak; Ila R Fiete
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources.

Authors:  Louise Marshall; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward Awh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Discrete-slots models of visual working-memory response times.

Authors:  Christopher Donkin; Robert M Nosofsky; Jason M Gold; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Strategic trade-offs between quantity and quality in working memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Sarah M Cormiea; Anish Kanabar; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.