Literature DB >> 15136005

Capacity limitations of visual memory in two-interval comparison of Gabor arrays.

Louise Lakha1, Michael J Wright.   

Abstract

The capacity of short-term visual memory (VSTM) was assessed in a two-interval spatial frequency (SF) discrimination task. The cued Gabor target in a multi-element array either increased or decreased in SF across a 2 s inter-stimulus interval (ISI). Distracters as well as target were made to change across ISI so that memory of the individual SF of Gabor elements was required to solve the discrimination. The dynamics of the information loss from visual memory were analysed by manipulating the timing of spatial cues and masks. Cueing the target position before the first display gave thresholds comparable with those for a single Gabor patch. Cues placed after the first display gave higher thresholds indicating some loss of information. Within the ISI there was little increase in threshold or set size effect with cue delay. However there was a sharp rise in thresholds for cue positions after the second display. Gabor masks placed before a mid-ISI cue were more effective than noise masks or Gabor masks placed after the cue. With a cue placed late in the ISI, preceded by a Gabor mask, the masking effect decreased with increasing delay of the mask after the first display. This suggests a selective, dynamic but increasingly durable representation of the initial stimulus is built up in memory, and there is a graded form of "overwriting" of this representation by new stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136005     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Accessing long-term memory representations during visual change detection.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; Amanda E van Lamsweerde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

2.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources.

Authors:  Louise Marshall; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Nikos Gorgoraptis; Natalie Wee; Louise Marshall; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Monkeys and humans take local uncertainty into account when localizing a change.

Authors:  Deepna Devkar; Anthony A Wright; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Precision of working memory for visual motion sequences and transparent motion surfaces.

Authors:  Nahid Zokaei; Nikos Gorgoraptis; Bahador Bahrami; Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual memory needs categories.

Authors:  Henrik Olsson; Leo Poom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Modulation of activity in human visual area V1 during memory masking.

Authors:  Markus H Sneve; Dag Alnæs; Tor Endestad; Mark W Greenlee; Svein Magnussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Age-related decline of precision and binding in visual working memory.

Authors:  Muy-Cheng Peich; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-08-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.