Literature DB >> 10713496

Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements.

M S John1, T W Picton.   

Abstract

Human auditory steady-state responses were recorded to four stimuli, with carrier frequencies (f(c)) of 750, 1500, 3000 and 6000 Hz, presented simultaneously at 60 dB SPL. Each carrier frequency was modulated by a specific modulation frequency (f(m)) of 80.6, 85.5, 90.3 or 95.2 Hz. By using four different recording conditions we obtained responses for all permutations of f(m) and f(c). The phase delays (P) of the responses were unwrapped and converted to latency (L) using the equation: L=P/(360xf(m)). The number of cycles of the stimulus that occurred prior to the recorded response was estimated by analyzing the effect of modulation frequency on the responses. These calculations provided latencies of 20.7, 17.7, 16.1 and 16.1 ms for carrier frequencies 750, 1500, 3000 and 6000 Hz. This latency difference of about 4.5 ms between low and high carrier frequencies remained constant over many different manipulations of the stimuli: faster modulation rates (150-190 Hz), binaural rather than monaural presentation, different intensities, stimuli presented alone or in conjunction with other stimuli, and modulation frequencies that were separated by as little as 0.24 Hz. This frequency-related delay is greater than that measured using transient evoked potentials, most likely because of differences in how transient and steady-state responses are generated and how their latencies are determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10713496     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00209-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  22 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

3.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

4.  Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory steady-state responses to monaural and diotic stimulation.

Authors:  Hanne Poelmans; Heleen Luts; Maaike Vandermosten; Pol Ghesquière; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-28

5.  Inferior colliculus contributions to phase encoding of stop consonants in an animal model.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Daniel A Abrams; Trent G Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing.

Authors:  A Tierney; A Parbery-Clark; E Skoe; N Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  [Steady-state responses of the auditory system: a comparison of different methods].

Authors:  S Liebler; S Hoth; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.

Authors:  Timothy S Wilding; Colette M McKay; Richard J Baker; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Identifying congenital hearing impairment: preliminary results from a comparative study using objective and subjective audiometric protocols.

Authors:  A Ciorba; S Hatzopoulos; J Petruccelli; M Mazzoli; A Pastore; K Kochanek; P Skarzynski; A Wlodarczyk; H Skarzynski
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.